Literature DB >> 15883659

Socioeconomic influences on bone health in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES III, 1988-1994.

May-Choo Wang1, L Beth Dixon.   

Abstract

Our objectives were (1) to examine the associations of education and income with bone health in non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black and Mexican-American postmenopausal women, (2) to determine if any observed associations can be explained by behavioral factors such as calcium intake and physical activity and (3) to determine if government food assistance and education are associated with increased calcium intake among low-income women. Cross-sectional data were gathered by the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 (NHANES III) using a stratified multistage probability design. Bone health was indicated by total hip bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2). Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the associations of education, income and behavioral factors with BMD. There were 2,905 postmenopausal women with acceptable DXA scans and complete relevant data selected from a nationally representative sample of the civilian non-institutionalized population aged 2 months and older. Education and income were positively associated with BMD in Black and White women, respectively, but not in Mexican-American women. When behavioral factors were included in the analyses, associations with education and income were eliminated. Instead, positive associations with estrogen use, calcium intake and physical activity, and a negative association with smoking, were noted in White women. Among low-income women, education was associated with increased calcium intake, while participation in the Food Stamp Program was associated with increased calcium intake in Black women. We conclude that education and/or income are positively associated with BMD among Black and White postmenopausal women, and that efforts to promote bone health among low-income women are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15883659     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1917-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  37 in total

1.  New concepts for nutrition education in an era of welfare reform.

Authors:  C G Arnold; P Ladipo; C H Nguyen; P Nkinda-Chaiban; C M Olson
Journal:  J Nutr Educ       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  Sex and ethnic differences in bone architecture.

Authors:  Dorothy A Nelson; Mary S Megyesi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Bone density in premenopausal women: effects of age, dietary intake, physical activity, smoking, and birth-control pills.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Differences in energy, nutrient, and food intakes in a US sample of Mexican-American women and men: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.

Authors:  L B Dixon; J Sundquist; M Winkleby
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Relationship between body composition and bone mass in women.

Authors:  S Khosla; E J Atkinson; B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density in a male Caucasian population.

Authors:  J R Elliot; N L Gilchrist; J E Wells
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  A multicenter, case control study of risk factors for low tibial speed of sound among residents of urban areas in Turkey.

Authors:  Fatma Inanici-Ersöz; Yeşim Gökçe-Kutsal; Sema Oncel; Merih Eryavuz; Ozlen Peker; Seniz Ok
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Diet in midpuberty and sedentary activity in prepuberty predict peak bone mass.

Authors:  May-Choo Wang; Patricia B Crawford; Mark Hudes; Marta Van Loan; Kirstin Siemering; Laura K Bachrach
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 10.  Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Sobal; A J Stunkard
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  25 in total

1.  The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density testing in a public health-care system.

Authors:  S Demeter; W D Leslie; L Lix; L MacWilliam; G S Finlayson; M Reed
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Age trends in proximal femur geometry in men: variation by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  T G Travison; T J Beck; G R Esche; A B Araujo; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  The association between socioeconomic status and osteoporotic fracture in population-based adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  S L Brennan; J A Pasco; D M Urquhart; B Oldenburg; F Hanna; A E Wluka
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Opportunities in population-specific osteoporosis research and management.

Authors:  L J Melton; M A Marquez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Site-specific differences in bone mineral density in black and white premenopausal South African women.

Authors:  S Chantler; K Dickie; J H Goedecke; N S Levitt; E V Lambert; J Evans; Y Joffe; L K Micklesfield
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Associations between adverse social position and bone mineral density in women aged 50 years or older: data from the Manitoba Bone Density Program.

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Educational level and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal Moroccan women: a classification tree analysis.

Authors:  Fadoua Allali; Samira Rostom; Loubna Bennani; Redouane Abouqal; Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Calcium intake and bone mineral density as an example of non-linearity and threshold analysis.

Authors:  L P Breitling
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Association between socioeconomic status and bone mineral density in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  S L Brennan; J A Pasco; D M Urquhart; B Oldenburg; Y Wang; A E Wluka
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture.

Authors:  D S Zingmond; N F Soohoo; S L Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.