BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no available clinical tool to evaluate the amount of osseointegration and stability around dental implants. It has been recently suggested that changes in the stiffness of an implant in bone during healing may be monitored by using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). The aim of this study was to determine whether RFA can be integrated into the routine clinical evaluation of initial healing of dental implants. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (18 female and 13 male; mean age of 51.7 years) were included into this study. A total of 122 implants and three different, but comparable, implant designs were evaluated by using RFA. The specific transducer for each implant system was used. ISQ (implant stability quotient) readings were obtained for each implant at the time of surgery, 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively, and at the time of loading (3 or 6 months following surgery). Data were analyzed for different healing times, various anatomical locations, implant length, and type. Average time in function was 12 months. RESULTS: Two implants failed during healing. Implant stability was higher on the mandible compared to the maxilla for each implant system studied (Mann-Whitney test, P <0.01). ISQ readings decreased significantly at 3 and 6 weeks post-surgery compared to readings obtained at surgery (Wilcoxon matched pairs sign-rank tests, P <0.01). A recovery to the initial ISQ levels was noted at the time of implant loading. The possible effects of different types and lengths of implants to ISQ readings were examined. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study support the need for a clinical tool to evaluate dental implant stability prior to loading, especially for implants placed in the maxilla. It appears that implant stability is weakest at 3 to 6 weeks in one-stage non-loaded dental implants. ISQ readings can be used to determine different healing phases and the stability of dental implants. However, it is difficult to define a general standardized range of ISQ readings for successful implant integration for various implant systems. Thus, RFA values/ISQ levels should be calibrated for each implant system separately. Further studies are needed to compare the early changes seen in immediately loaded dental implants and to determine whether there is any time in which the total recovery in ISQ levels may occur.
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no available clinical tool to evaluate the amount of osseointegration and stability around dental implants. It has been recently suggested that changes in the stiffness of an implant in bone during healing may be monitored by using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). The aim of this study was to determine whether RFA can be integrated into the routine clinical evaluation of initial healing of dental implants. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (18 female and 13 male; mean age of 51.7 years) were included into this study. A total of 122 implants and three different, but comparable, implant designs were evaluated by using RFA. The specific transducer for each implant system was used. ISQ (implant stability quotient) readings were obtained for each implant at the time of surgery, 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively, and at the time of loading (3 or 6 months following surgery). Data were analyzed for different healing times, various anatomical locations, implant length, and type. Average time in function was 12 months. RESULTS: Two implants failed during healing. Implant stability was higher on the mandible compared to the maxilla for each implant system studied (Mann-Whitney test, P <0.01). ISQ readings decreased significantly at 3 and 6 weeks post-surgery compared to readings obtained at surgery (Wilcoxon matched pairs sign-rank tests, P <0.01). A recovery to the initial ISQ levels was noted at the time of implant loading. The possible effects of different types and lengths of implants to ISQ readings were examined. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study support the need for a clinical tool to evaluate dental implant stability prior to loading, especially for implants placed in the maxilla. It appears that implant stability is weakest at 3 to 6 weeks in one-stage non-loaded dental implants. ISQ readings can be used to determine different healing phases and the stability of dental implants. However, it is difficult to define a general standardized range of ISQ readings for successful implant integration for various implant systems. Thus, RFA values/ISQ levels should be calibrated for each implant system separately. Further studies are needed to compare the early changes seen in immediately loaded dental implants and to determine whether there is any time in which the total recovery in ISQ levels may occur.
Authors: Thomas W Oates; Patrick Galloway; Peggy Alexander; Adriana Vargas Green; Guy Huynh-Ba; Jocelyn Feine; C Alex McMahan Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.634