PURPOSE: The aim of study paper is to present an overview of osseointegration of dental implants, focusing on tissue response, surface modifications and future perspective. DISCUSSION: Great progress has been made over the decades in the understanding of osseous peri-implant healing of dental implants, leading to the development of new implant materials and surfaces. However, failures and losses of implants are an indicator that there is room for improvement. Of particular importance is the understanding of the biological interaction between the implant and its surrounding bone. CONCLUSION: The survival rates of dental implants in bone of over 90 % after 10 years show that they are an effective and well-established therapy option. However, new implant materials and surface modifications may be able to improve osseointegration of medical implants especially when the wound healing is compromised. Advanced techniques of evaluation are necessary to understand and validate osseointegration in these cases. An overview regarding the current state of the art in experimental evaluation of osseointegration of implants and implant material modifications will be given in Part II.
PURPOSE: The aim of study paper is to present an overview of osseointegration of dental implants, focusing on tissue response, surface modifications and future perspective. DISCUSSION: Great progress has been made over the decades in the understanding of osseous peri-implant healing of dental implants, leading to the development of new implant materials and surfaces. However, failures and losses of implants are an indicator that there is room for improvement. Of particular importance is the understanding of the biological interaction between the implant and its surrounding bone. CONCLUSION: The survival rates of dental implants in bone of over 90 % after 10 years show that they are an effective and well-established therapy option. However, new implant materials and surface modifications may be able to improve osseointegration of medical implants especially when the wound healing is compromised. Advanced techniques of evaluation are necessary to understand and validate osseointegration in these cases. An overview regarding the current state of the art in experimental evaluation of osseointegration of implants and implant material modifications will be given in Part II.
Authors: K Gotfredsen; E Rostrup; E Hjörting-Hansen; K Stoltze; E Budtz-Jörgensen Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 1991 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Vidyadhar V Upasani; Christine L Farnsworth; Tucker Tomlinson; Reid C Chambers; Shunji Tsutsui; Michael A Slivka; Andrew T Mahar; Peter O Newton Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Brian P Dickinson; Rebekah K Ashley; Kristy L Wasson; Catherine O'Hara; Joubin Gabbay; Justin B Heller; James P Bradley Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Maria Sartori; Gianluca Giavaresi; Annapaola Parrilli; Andrea Ferrari; Nicolò Nicoli Aldini; Marco Morra; Clara Cassinelli; Daniele Bollati; Milena Fini Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-07-25 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Ralf Smeets; Bernd Stadlinger; Frank Schwarz; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Ole Jung; Clarissa Precht; Frank Kloss; Alexander Gröbe; Max Heiland; Tobias Ebker Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Jeanne-Marie Damerau; Susanne Bierbaum; Daniel Wiedemeier; Paula Korn; Ralf Smeets; Gregor Jenny; Johanna Nadalini; Bernd Stadlinger Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 3.405