Literature DB >> 7930078

Vibrotactile adaptation enhances frequency discrimination.

A K Goble1, M Hollins.   

Abstract

Human vibrotactile frequency discrimination (with respect to a 25-Hz standard stimulus, 20 dB above unadapted detection threshold) was measured on the thenar eminence and index fingerpad, using two-interval forced-choice tracking. Measurements were made in the unadapted state and following exposure to 25-Hz adapting stimuli of various amplitudes. The standard and all comparison stimuli were equated for perceived intensity, on the basis of matching experiments that were carried out separately under each adapting condition. Frequency difference thresholds were lowest when the amplitude of the adapting stimulus was equal to the amplitude of the standard. This result complements the earlier finding [A. K. Goble and M. Hollins, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 418-424 (1993)] that adaptation sharpens amplitude discrimination of supraliminal stimuli that are similar to the adapting stimulus. Taken together, these discoveries suggest that somatosensory mechanisms that are engaged by extended stimulation serve to enhance detection of changes in the properties, both quantitative and qualitative, of that stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7930078     DOI: 10.1121/1.410314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; Y Y Leung; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Representation of object size in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  L J Berryman; J M Yau; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law.

Authors:  E Francisco; V Tannan; Z Zhang; J Holden; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Frequency-domain measurement of vibrotactile driving responses in first-order afferent populations.

Authors:  E F Kelly; D F McLaughlin; W J Dunseath; S Folger; F Jones; H K Hudnell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Discrimination of vibrotactile frequencies in a delayed pair comparison task.

Authors:  R J Sinclair; H Burton
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

6.  Using space and time to encode vibrotactile information: toward an estimate of the skin's achievable throughput.

Authors:  Scott D Novich; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory adaptation improves tactile frequency perception.

Authors:  Lexi E Crommett; Alexis Pérez-Bellido; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cutaneous stimulation of the digits and lips evokes responses with different adaptation patterns in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mihai Popescu; Steven Barlow; Elena-Anda Popescu; Meredith E Estep; Lalit Venkatesan; Edward T Auer; William M Brooks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Rapid Sensory Adaptation Redux: A Circuit Perspective.

Authors:  Clarissa J Whitmire; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Auditory and tactile frequency representations are co-embedded in modality-defined cortical sensory systems.

Authors:  Md Shoaibur Rahman; Kelly Anne Barnes; Lexi E Crommett; Mark Tommerdahl; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.