Literature DB >> 19076664

Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?

Larissa Nekhlyudov1, Rong Li, Suzanne W Fletcher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Informed decision making regarding screening mammography is recommended for women under age 50. To what extent it occurs in clinical settings is unclear.
METHODS: Using a mailed instrument, we surveyed women aged 40-44 prior to their first screening mammogram. All women were members of a large health maintenance organization and received care at a large medical practice in the Greater Boston area. The survey measured informed decision making, decisional conflict, satisfaction, and screening mammography knowledge and intentions to undergo screening.
RESULTS: Ninety-six women responded to the survey (response rate 47%). Overall, women reported limited informed decision making regarding screening mammography, both with respect to information exchange and involvement in the decision process. Less than half (47%) reported discussing the benefits of screening; 23% the uncertainties; and only 7% the harms. About 30% reported discussing the nature of the decision or clinical issue; and 29% reported their provider elicited their preferred role in the decision; 38% their preferences; and 24% their understanding of the information. Women who were uninformed had higher decisional conflict (2.37 vs. 1.83, P=0.005) about screening mammography and were more likely to be dissatisfied with the information and involvement. Women's screening mammography knowledge was limited in most areas; however being presented with information did not diminish their intentions to undergo screening.
CONCLUSION: Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography is limited in this setting. There appears to be little indication that information about the benefits and harms decreases women's intentions to undergo screening. Methods to communicate information to women before initiating screening mammography are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19076664      PMCID: PMC5060464          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00514.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  33 in total

1.  A piece of my mind. Winners and losers.

Authors:  Daniel Merenstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; M Wensing; K Hood; C Atwell; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

4.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors:  C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin; H C Sox; B Fischhoff; H G Welch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-17

6.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Evaluation of a breast cancer patient information and support program.

Authors:  A M Geiger; E S Mullen; P A Sloman; B W Edgerton; D B Petitti
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

8.  Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40s before their first screening mammogram.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Rong Li; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-27

9.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  8 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Scott Klarenbach; Nicki Sims-Jones; Gabriela Lewin; Harminder Singh; Guylène Thériault; Marcello Tonelli; Marion Doull; Susan Courage; Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge, and Intentions for Breast Cancer Screening in a Diverse Sample of Women Age Eligible for Mammography.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Janna Z Andrews; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.

Authors:  Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Sarah M Jenkins; Erica J Sutton; Caroline Horrow; Iftikhar J Kullo; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Harnessing Information Technology to Inform Patients Facing Routine Decisions: Cancer Screening as a Test Case.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Camille Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Paulette Kashiri; Resa M Jones; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Rebecca S Etz; Shin-Ping Tu
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Carmen L Lewis; Michael P Pignone; Mick P Couper; Michael J Barry; Joann G Elmore; Carrie A Levin; John Van Hoewyk; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Engaging Patients in Decisions About Cancer Screening: Exploring the Decision Journey Through the Use of a Patient Portal.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Alex H Krist; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Resa M Jones; Rebecca R Lehman; Camille J Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Dominick L Frosch; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Daniel R Longo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Change in Breast Cancer Screening Knowledge is Associated With Change in Mammogram Intention in Mexican-Origin Women After an Educational Intervention.

Authors:  Jennifer J Salinas; Theresa Byrd; Charmaine Martin; Alok K Dwivedi; Adam Alomari; Rebekah Salaiz; Navkiran K Shokar
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2018-06-18

8.  What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?

Authors:  John D Keen; James E Keen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.