Literature DB >> 3977198

Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes.

S Greenfield, S Kaplan, J E Ware.   

Abstract

An intervention was developed to increase patient involvement in care. Using a treatment algorithm as a guide, patients were helped to read their medical record and coached to ask questions and negotiate medical decisions with their physicians during a 20-minute session before their regularly scheduled visit. In a randomized controlled trial we compared this intervention with a standard educational session of equal length in a clinic for patients with ulcer disease. Six to eight weeks after the trial, patients in the experimental group reported fewer limitations in physical and role-related activities (p less than 0.05), preferred a more active role in medical decision-making, and were as satisfied with their care as the control group. Analysis of audiotapes of physician-patient interactions showed that patients in the experimental group were twice as effective as control patients in obtaining information from physicians (p less than 0.05). Results of the intervention included increased involvement in the interaction with the physician, fewer limitations imposed by the disease on patients' functional ability, and increased preference for active involvement in medical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3977198     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  324 in total

1.  Why DISCERN?

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Deborah Charnock
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  For and against: Direct to consumer advertising is medicalising normal human experience: Against.

Authors:  Silvia N Bonaccorso; Jeffrey L Sturchio
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

3.  Managed care in the public sector: lessons learned from the Los Angeles PARTNERS program.

Authors:  G Sullivan; A S Young; S Fortney; D Tillipman; D Murata; P Koegel
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Empowering patients using computer based health support systems.

Authors:  D H Gustafson; F M McTavish; E Boberg; B H Owens; C Sherbeck; M Wise; S Pingree; R P Hawkins
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-03

5.  A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Providers, payers, the community, and patients are all obliged to get patient activation and engagement ethically right.

Authors:  Marion Danis; Mildred Solomon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; William D Clark; Janice L Hanson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  The parameters of informed consent.

Authors:  Edward L Raab
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

9.  Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction.

Authors:  James D Ralston; David Carrell; Robert Reid; Melissa Anderson; Maureena Moran; James Hereford
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Patient satisfaction in women's clinics versus traditional primary care clinics in the Veterans Administration.

Authors:  Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry; Chung-Chou H Chang; Melissa A McNeil; Jeff Whittle; Patricia M Hayes; Sarah Hudson Scholle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.