Literature DB >> 7713404

On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes.

A Caballero1.   

Abstract

Inconsistencies between equations for the effective population size of populations with separate sexes obtained by two different approaches are explained. One approach, which is the most common in the literature, is based on the assumption that the sex of the progeny cannot be identified. The second approach incorporates identification of the sexes of both parents and offspring. The approaches lead to identical expressions for effective size under some situations, such as Poisson distributions of offspring numbers. In general, however, the first approach gives incorrect answers, which become particularly severe for sex-linked genes, because then only numbers of daughters of males are relevant. Predictions of the effective size for sex-linked genes are illustrated for different systems of mating.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7713404      PMCID: PMC1206352     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  3 in total

1.  A note on effective population size with overlapping generations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inbreeding and homozygosis in bees.

Authors:  J F CROW; W C ROBERTS
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1950-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effective population size of an age-structured population with a sex-linked locus.

Authors:  E Pollak
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.144

  3 in total
  45 in total

Review 1.  The degeneration of Y chromosomes.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Reduced sequence variability on the Neo-Y chromosome of Drosophila americana americana.

Authors:  B F McAllister; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Can a sex-biased human demography account for the reduced effective population size of chromosome X in non-Africans?

Authors:  Alon Keinan; David Reich
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Sex-averaged recombination and mutation rates on the X chromosome: a comment on Labuda et al.

Authors:  Kirk E Lohmueller; Jeremiah D Degenhardt; Alon Keinan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Relaxation of selection with equalization of parental contributions in conservation programs: an experimental test with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S T Rodríguez-Ramilo; P Morán; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jerel C Davis; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Effective population size and population subdivision in demographically structured populations.

Authors:  Valérie Laporte; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Population size changes reshape genomic patterns of diversity.

Authors:  John E Pool; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The impact of founder events on chromosomal variability in multiply mating species.

Authors:  John E Pool; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Peter Andolfatto; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.