Literature DB >> 15964705

FDG-PET in the prediction of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer.

Si Yeol Song1, Jong Hoon Kim, Jin Sook Ryu, Gin Hyug Lee, Sung Bae Kim, Seung Il Park, Ho-Young Song, Kyung-Ja Cho, Seung Do Ahn, Sang-Wook Lee, Seong Soo Shin, Eun Kyung Choi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for predicting a pathologic response in locally advanced esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All enrolled patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy and underwent two FDG-PET scans, before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. We compared the results of the preoperative FDG-PET scans with the pathologic results.
RESULTS: From July 2001 to July 2004, 32 patients (29 men and 3 women) were enrolled in this study. Pathologic complete response (pCR) in the esophagus was achieved in 21 of 32 patients (66%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in the primary tumors of the preoperative FDG-PET were 27%, 95%, 75%, and 71%, respectively. In regional lymph nodes, these values were 16%, 98%, 36%, and 93%, respectively. The mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of primary tumors was initially 5.6 +/- 3.6 and changed to 1.5 +/- 1.3 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.05). If analysis of metabolic response (SUV decrease, DeltaSUV) was limited to initially highly metabolic primary tumors (SUV > or =4.0), pathologic response was correlated with metabolic response (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the pathologic response of an initially highly metabolic tumor after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could be correlated with the metabolic response, and FDG-PET can provide additional information on tumor response to chemoradiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15964705     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  42 in total

1.  Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Michael Christensen; Jonathan D Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Kevin Crawford; Oleh Haluszka; Jeffrey Tokar; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Alan Maurer; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

3.  The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tracy Klayton; Tianyu Li; Jian Q Yu; Lanea Keller; Jonathan Cheng; Steven J Cohen; Neal J Meropol; Walter Scott; Meng Xu-Welliver; Andre Konski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

4.  PET: other thoracic malignancies.

Authors:  Leslie E Quint
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Positron Emission Tomography's Utility in Esophageal Cancer Management.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Y Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eugene Y Chang; Xin Li; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Ryan A Priest; C Kristian Enestvedt; Jingang Xu; Charles S Springer; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  State-of-the-art molecular imaging in esophageal cancer management: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Jolinta Lin; Seth Kligerman; Rakhi Goel; Payam Sajedi; Mohan Suntharalingam; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

9.  The predictive value of treatment response using FDG PET performed on day 21 of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A prospective, multicentre study (RTEP3).

Authors:  Odré Palie; Pierre Michel; Jean-François Ménard; Caroline Rousseau; Emmanuel Rio; Boumédiene Bridji; Ahmed Benyoucef; Marc-Etienne Meyer; Khadija Jalali; Stéphane Bardet; Che Mabubu M'vondo; Pierre Olivier; Guillaume Faure; Emmanuel Itti; Christian Diana; Claire Houzard; Françoise Mornex; Frederic Di Fiore; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT metabolic index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Jin-Bo Yue; Han-Xi Zhao; Xin-Dong Sun; Li Kong; Zheng Fu; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.