Literature DB >> 17768665

The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Eugene Y Chang1, Xin Li, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Ryan A Priest, C Kristian Enestvedt, Jingang Xu, Charles S Springer, Blair A Jobe.   

Abstract

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation eradicates esophageal adenocarcinoma in a substantial proportion of patients, conventional imaging techniques cannot accurately detect this response. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is an emerging approach that may be well suited to fill this role. This pilot study evaluates the ability of this method to discriminate adenocarcinoma from normal esophageal tissue. Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and control subjects underwent scanning. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent pre- and postchemoradiation scans. Parameters were extracted for each pixel were Ktrans (equilibrium rate for transfer of contrast reagent across the vascular wall), ve (volume fraction of interstitial space), and taui (mean intracellular water lifetime). Five esophageal adenocarcinoma patients and two tumor-free control subjects underwent scanning. The mean Ktrans value was 5.7 times greater in esophageal adenocarcinoma, and taui is 2.0 times smaller, than in the control subjects. Ktrans decreased by 11.4-fold after chemoradiation. Parametric maps qualitatively demonstrate a difference in Ktrans. DCE MRI of the esophagus is feasible. Ktrans, a parameter that has demonstrated discriminative ability in other malignancies, also shows promise in differentiating esophageal adenocarcinoma from benign tissue. The determination of Ktrans represents an in vivo assay for endothelial permeability and thus may serve as a quantitative measure of response to induction chemoradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17768665     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0253-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  51 in total

1.  Angiogenesis in the neoplastic sequence of Barrett's oesophagus. Correlation with VEGF expression.

Authors:  A Couvelard; F Paraf; V Gratio; J Y Scoazec; D Hénin; C Degott; J F Fléjou
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.996

2.  Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Wei Huang; Jonathan P Dyke; Xin Li; Alina Tudorica; Jing-Huei Lee; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  3D MR gastrography: exoscopic and endoscopic analysis of the stomach.

Authors:  M R Schmid; T F Hany; L Knesplova; R Schlumpf; J F Debatin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors.

Authors:  M V Knopp; E Weiss; H P Sinn; J Mattern; H Junkermann; J Radeleff; A Magener; G Brix; S Delorme; I Zuna; G van Kaick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Pathologic prognostic factors in Barrett's associated adenocarcinoma: a follow-up study of 96 patients.

Authors:  C Torres; J R Turner; H H Wang; W Richards; D Sugarbaker; A Shahsafaei; R D Odze
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Long-term outcome of phase II trial evaluating chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani; Ritsuko Komaki; Jonathan C Nesbitt; Arlene M Correa; James D Cox; Sandeep Lahoti; Faye Martin; Joe B Putnam; W Roy Smythe; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locoregional esophageal cancer: preliminary report.

Authors:  S B Kim; S H Kim; K H Lee; J W Lee; S W Kim; C W Suh; J S Lee; H Y Song; H S Chang; E K Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  19 in total

1.  Oesophageal cancer: can imaging improve its assessment?

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Assessment of neovascular permeability in a pancreatic tumor model using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with contrast agents of different molecular weights.

Authors:  Louke J Delrue; Veerle Casneuf; Nancy Van Damme; Peter Blanckaert; Marc Peeters; Wim P Ceelen; Philippe C O Duyck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Xin Li; Yiyi Chen; Xia Li; Ming-Ching Chang; Matthew J Oborski; Dariya I Malyarenko; Mark Muzi; Guido H Jajamovich; Andriy Fedorov; Alina Tudorica; Sandeep N Gupta; Charles M Laymon; Kenneth I Marro; Hadrien A Dyvorne; James V Miller; Daniel P Barbodiak; Thomas L Chenevert; Thomas E Yankeelov; James M Mountz; Paul E Kinahan; Ron Kikinis; Bachir Taouli; Fiona Fennessy; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for advanced esophageal cancer response assessment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Na-Na Sun; Chang Liu; Xiao-Lin Ge; Jie Wang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Derived Intracellular Water Lifetime (τ i ): A Prognostic Marker for Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Authors:  S Chawla; L A Loevner; S G Kim; W-T Hwang; S Wang; G Verma; S Mohan; V LiVolsi; H Quon; H Poptani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Assessment of esophageal carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy with quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jing Lei; Qian Han; Shaocheng Zhu; Dapeng Shi; Shewei Dou; Zihua Su; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Estimation of cellular-interstitial water exchange in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using two flip angles.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Feasibility of using limited-population-based average R10 for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Ya Wang; David M Panicek; Lawrence H Schwartz; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 9.  Pneumo-CT assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: Imaging-pathological correlation.

Authors:  Marina Ulla; Ernestina Gentile; Ezequiel Levy Yeyati; Maria L Diez; Demetrio Cavadas; Ricardo D Garcia-Monaco; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-12-15

Review 10.  Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what's the role of MRI?

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Richard van Hillegersberg; Frederiek M Lever; Irene M Lips; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Gert J Meijer; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Marco van Vulpen; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.