Literature DB >> 23715903

The predictive value of treatment response using FDG PET performed on day 21 of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A prospective, multicentre study (RTEP3).

Odré Palie1, Pierre Michel, Jean-François Ménard, Caroline Rousseau, Emmanuel Rio, Boumédiene Bridji, Ahmed Benyoucef, Marc-Etienne Meyer, Khadija Jalali, Stéphane Bardet, Che Mabubu M'vondo, Pierre Olivier, Guillaume Faure, Emmanuel Itti, Christian Diana, Claire Houzard, Françoise Mornex, Frederic Di Fiore, Pierre Vera.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: FDG PET has been suggested to have predictive value in the prognosis of oesophageal carcinoma. However, the retrospective studies reported in the literature have shown discordant results. Additionally, only four studies have evaluated FDG PET during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with different histological lesions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of FDG PET performed early during CRT (on day 21) in a population of patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS: Included in this prospective study were 57 patients with a histological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Of these 57 patients, 48 (84%) were evaluated (aged 63 ± 11 years; 44 men, 4 women). Each patient underwent FDG PET (4.5 MBq/kg) before CRT, according to the Herskovic protocol (t0; PET₁) and on day 21 ± 3 from the start of CRT (d21; PET₂). The response assessment included a clinical examination, CT scan or FDG PET and histological analysis 3 months and 1 year after PET₁. The patients were classified as showing a complete response (CR) or a noncomplete response. A quantitative analysis was carried out for PET₁ and PET₂ using the following parameters: SUVmax, SUVmean (with SUVmean40 as the 3-D volume at an SUVmax threshold of 40% and SUVmeanp as that defined by a physician), tumour volume (TV, with TV40 defined as the TV at 40% of SUVmax, and TVp as that defined by a physician); and the total lesion glycolysis (TLG, SUVmean × TV, with TLG₄₀ defined as the TLG at 40% of SUVmax, and TLGp as that defined by a physician). The differences in responses at 3 months and 1 year between PET₁ (t0) and PET₂ (d21) were assessed in terms of variations in SUV, TV and TLG using a repeated measures of variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS: SUVmax, SUVmean and TLG decreased significantly between PET₁ (t0) and PET₂ (d21; p < 0.0001). The TV significantly decreased only when assessed as TVp (p = 0.02); TV₄₀ did not decrease significantly. With respect to the predictive value of PET₁, only TV40_1 and TVp_1 values, and therefore TLG40_1 and TLGp_1, but not the SUV values, were significantly lower in patients with CR at 3 months. SUVmax1, TVp_1 and TLGp_1 were significantly lower in patients with CR at 1 year. With respect to the predictive value of PET₂, only TV40_2 and TVp_2 values, and therefore TLG40_2 and TLGp_2, but not the SUV values, were significantly lower in patients with CR at 3 months. None of the PET₂ parameters had significant value in predicting patient outcome at 1 year. The changes in SUVmax, TV₄₀, TVp, TLG₄₀ and TLGp between PET₁ and PET₂ had no relationship to patient outcome at 3 months or 1 year.
CONCLUSION: This prospective, multicentre study performed in a selected population of patients with oesophageal squamous cell cancer demonstrates that the parameters derived from baseline PET₁ are good predictors of response to CRT. Specifically, a high TV and TLG are associated with a poor response to CRT at 3 months and 1 year, and a high SUVmax is associated with a poor response to CRT at 1 year. FDG PET performed during CRT on day 21 appears to have less clinical relevance. However, patients with a large functional TV on day 21 of CRT have a poor clinical outcome (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00934505).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23715903     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2450-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  42 in total

Review 1.  Gastrointestinal cancers in Europe.

Authors:  M R B Keighley
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Monitoring of response to pre-operative chemoradiation in combination with hyperthermia in oesophageal cancer by FDG-PET.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Jikke M T Omloo; Gerrit W Sloof; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Otto S Hoekstra; Hans Crezee; Ronald Boellaard; Walter L Vervenne; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Jan J B van Lanschot
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.914

3.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  An easy-to-use phantom and protocol for weekly PET quality assessment: a multicenter study.

Authors:  M Vermandel; L Fin; S Hapdey; A Bol; N Betrouni; J Daouk; I Gardi; J Lee; R Jounwaz; J Rousseau; D Huglo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Serial assessment of FDG-PET FDG uptake and functional volume during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Agathe Edet-Sanson; Bernard Dubray; Kaya Doyeux; Adeline Back; Sebastien Hapdey; Romain Modzelewski; Pierre Bohn; Isabelle Gardin; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Frederic Di Fiore; Valérie Blondin; Anne Hitzel; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Ahmed Benyoucef; Emmanuel Huet; Pierre Vera; Pierre Michel
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.088

7.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Nidal M Albarghach; Florent Tixier; Olivier Pradier; Catherine Cheze-le Rest
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis.

Authors:  Steven M. Larson; Yusuf Erdi; Timothy Akhurst; Madhu Mazumdar; Homer A. Macapinlac; Ronald D. Finn; Cecille Casilla; Melissa Fazzari; Neil Srivastava; Henry W.D. Yeung; John L. Humm; Jose Guillem; Robert Downey; Martin Karpeh; Alfred E. Cohen; Robert Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1999-05

9.  Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus: response to chemoradiotherapy is associated with decrease of metabolic tumor volume as measured on PET-CT. Comparison to histopathologic and clinical response evaluation.

Authors:  Johannes B Roedl; Rivka R Colen; Nagaraj S Holalkere; Alan J Fischman; Noah C Choi; Michael A Blake
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 10.  Role of 18F-FDG PET in assessment of response in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  21 in total

1.  Change in volume parameters induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy provide accurate prediction of overall survival after resection in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Dietmar Tamandl; Richard M Gore; Barbara Fueger; Patrick Kinsperger; Michael Hejna; Matthias Paireder; Alexander Haug; Sebastian F Schoppmann; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Frank Hofheinz; Yimin Li; Ingo G Steffen; Qin Lin; Chen Lili; Wu Hua; Jörg van den Hoff; Sebastian Zschaeck
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  [Importance of PET in surgery of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  K Ott; T Schmidt; F Lordick; K Herrmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Prognostic utility of diffusion-weighted MRI in oesophageal cancer: is apparent diffusion coefficient a potential marker of tumour aggressiveness?

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Annalaura Salerno; Alessandro Ambrosi; Damiano Chiari; Elena Orsenigo; Antonio Esposito; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  High FDG uptake areas on pre-radiotherapy PET/CT identify preferential sites of local relapse after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jérémie Calais; Bernard Dubray; Lamyaa Nkhali; Sebastien Thureau; Charles Lemarignier; Romain Modzelewski; Isabelle Gardin; Frederic Di Fiore; Pierre Michel; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography for monitoring tumor response in esophageal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Peiliang Zhang; Zengyun Li; Dongqing Wang; Fuling Ma; Ran Zhang; Wanhua Liang; Mingping Sun; Zheng Fu; Xiaorong Sun
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Increased evidence for the prognostic value of FDG uptake on late-treatment PET in non-tumour-affected oesophagus in irradiated patients with oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yimin Li; Frank Hofheinz; Christian Furth; Chen Lili; Wu Hua; Pirus Ghadjar; Sebastian Zschaeck
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Increased FDG uptake on late-treatment PET in non-tumour-affected oesophagus is prognostic for pathological complete response and disease recurrence in patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Sebastian Zschaeck; Frank Hofheinz; Klaus Zöphel; Rebecca Bütof; Christina Jentsch; Julia Schmollack; Steffen Löck; Jörg Kotzerke; Gustavo Baretton; Jürgen Weitz; Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  [Characteristics analysis of early gastric cancer under white light endoscopy].

Authors:  X Liu; J Zhang; Y Wang; H J Zhang; S G Ding; L Y Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-04-18

10.  Pretreatment metabolic tumour volume is predictive of disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Charles Lemarignier; Frédéric Di Fiore; Charline Marre; Sébastien Hapdey; Romain Modzelewski; Pierrick Gouel; Pierre Michel; Bernard Dubray; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.