Literature DB >> 25879521

Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Laura L Reimers1, Parijatham S Sivasubramanian2, Dawn Hershman1,2,3, Mary Beth Terry1,3, Heather Greenlee1,3, Julie Campbell2, Kevin Kalinsky2,3, Matthew Maurer2,3, Ramona Jayasena3, Rossy Sandoval3, Maria Alvarez3, Katherine D Crew1,2,3.   

Abstract

Chemoprevention with the anti-estrogens, tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors, reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women; however, uptake has been poor (<5%) in the prevention setting. We assessed use of anti-estrogens for breast cancer prevention, among high-risk women seen at an academic breast center, to observe how uptake rates compare in this setting. We collected data on demographics, breast cancer risk factors, and health behaviors via self-administered questionnaires and medical chart abstraction. Women eligible for chemoprevention with anti-estrogens had a 5-year predicted breast cancer risk according to the Gail model of ≥1.67%, history of lobular or ductal carcinoma in situ (LCIS/DCIS), and/or BRCA mutation. We dichotomized anti-estrogen use as ever or never. Predictors of use were evaluated using multivariable log-binomial regression. Of 412 high-risk women enrolled, 316 (77%) were eligible for chemoprevention. Among eligible women, 55% were non-Hispanic white, 29% Hispanic, 8% non-Hispanic black, and 7% Asian. Women were grouped based upon their highest category of breast cancer risk (in descending order): BRCA mutation carriers (3%), DCIS (40%), LCIS (22%), and 5-year Gail risk ≥1.67% (36%). Among those eligible for chemoprevention, 162 (51%) had ever initiated anti-estrogen therapy (71% tamoxifen, 23% raloxifene, 5% aromatase inhibitor). Anti-estrogen use was highest among women with DCIS (73%). In multivariable analysis, women with a 5-year Gail risk ≥1.67% had approximately a 20% lower likelihood of anti-estrogen use compared to women with DCIS (p = 0.01). In the primary prevention setting, excluding women diagnosed with DCIS, anti-estrogen use was 37%. Multivariable analysis showed differences in uptake by education and potentially by race/ethnicity. Among high-risk women seen at a breast center, anti-estrogen use for chemoprevention was relatively high as compared to the published literature. Clinicians can support high-risk women by effectively communicating breast cancer risk and enhancing knowledge about the risks and benefits of chemoprevention.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aromatase inhibitor; breast cancer; chemoprevention; high-risk; raloxifene; selective estrogen receptor modulator; tamoxifen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25879521      PMCID: PMC4490034          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  53 in total

1.  The lack, need, and opportunities for decision-making and informational tools to educate primary-care physicians and women about breast cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Peter M Ravdin
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-06

2.  Implementation in a large health system of a program to identify women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  William L Owens; Thomas J Gallagher; Michael J Kincheloe; Victoria L Ruetten
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Reena S Cecchini; Walter M Cronin; Andre Robidoux; Therese B Bevers; Maureen T Kavanah; James N Atkins; Richard G Margolese; Carolyn D Runowicz; Joan M James; Leslie G Ford; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Breast cancer risk assessment in indigent women at a public hospital.

Authors:  N R Abu-Rustum; H Herbolsheimer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Twenty-year follow-up of the Royal Marsden randomized, double-blinded tamoxifen breast cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  Trevor J Powles; Sue Ashley; Alwynne Tidy; Ian E Smith; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Continuing outcomes relevant to Evista: breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal osteoporotic women in a randomized trial of raloxifene.

Authors:  Silvana Martino; Jane A Cauley; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Trevor J Powles; John Mershon; Damon Disch; Roberta J Secrest; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: late results of the Italian Randomized Tamoxifen Prevention Trial among women with hysterectomy.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Nicole Rotmensz; Bernardo Bonanni; Peter Boyle; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Costa; Virgilio Sacchini; Roberto Travaglini; Giuseppe D'Aiuto; Pasquale Oliviero; Francesco Lovison; Giacomo Gucciardo; Marco Rosselli del Turco; Maria Grazia Muraca; Maria Antonietta Pizzichetta; Serafino Conforti; Andrea Decensi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project update: prevention trials and endocrine therapy of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Acceptance of tamoxifen chemoprevention by physicians and women at risk.

Authors:  Julia Tchou; Nanjiang Hou; Alfred Rademaker; V Craig Jordan; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Atypia in random periareolar fine-needle aspiration affects the decision of women at high risk to take tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Vanessa K Goldenberg; Victoria L Seewaldt; Victoria Scott; Gregory R Bean; Gloria Broadwater; Carol Fabian; Bruce Kimler; Carola Zalles; Isaac M Lipkus
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  12 in total

1.  Chemoprevention Uptake among Women with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Meghna S Trivedi; Austin M Coe; Alejandro Vanegas; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms of the preventable causes of cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Erica A Golemis; Paul Scheet; Tim N Beck; Eward M Scolnick; David J Hunter; Ernest Hawk; Nancy Hopkins
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Chemoprevention Uptake for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Varies by Risk Factor.

Authors:  Meghan R Flanagan; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Debra A Mangino; Monica Morrow; Melissa L Pilewskie
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Personalised medicine and population health: breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Steven A Narod
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Cancer Prevention in Primary Care: Perception of Importance, Recognition of Risk Factors and Prescribing Behaviors.

Authors:  Goli Samimi; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Christine Holmberg; Bethany Tennant; Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard; Kisha I Coa; Shelley S Kay; Leslie G Ford; Eva Szabo; Lori M Minasian
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Prescribing practices of endocrine therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ in British Columbia.

Authors:  A T Chaudhry; T A Koulis; C Speers; R A Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Adjuvant radiotherapy for primary breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and risk of contralateral breast cancer with special attention to patients irradiated at younger age.

Authors:  Jan Drooger; Delal Akdeniz; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Linetta B Koppert; Danielle McCool; Caroline M Seynaeve; Maartje J Hooning; Agnes Jager
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Anti-Estrogen Withdrawal Effect With Raloxifene? A Case Report.

Authors:  Walter Lemmo
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.279

9.  Introducing a Comprehensive Informatics Framework to Promote Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Chemoprevention in the Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  Joseph Finkelstein; Jeffrey Wood; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2017-07-26

10.  Are Global Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Patterns Related to Country-Specific Economic Development and Prevention Strategies?

Authors:  Martine Bellanger; Nur Zeinomar; Parisa Tehranifar; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.