Literature DB >> 15937119

Visual memory needs categories.

Henrik Olsson1, Leo Poom.   

Abstract

Capacity limitations in the way humans store and process information in working memory have been extensively studied, and several memory systems have been distinguished. In line with previous capacity estimates for verbal memory and memory for spatial information, recent studies suggest that it is possible to retain up to four objects in visual working memory. The objects used have typically been categorically different colors and shapes. Because knowledge about categories is stored in long-term memory, these estimations of working memory capacity have been contaminated by long-term memory support. We show that when using clearly distinguishable intracategorical items, visual working memory has a maximum capacity of only one object. Because attention is closely involved in the working memory process, our results add to other studies demonstrating capacity limitations of human attention such as inattentional blindness and change blindness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937119      PMCID: PMC1150822          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500810102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Organization of visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Y Jiang; I R Olson; M M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Low-level memory processes in vision.

Authors:  S Magnussen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Binding in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  Mary E Wheeler; Anne M Treisman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-03

6.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  What's new in visual masking?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects.

Authors:  G A Alvarez; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-02

9.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Working memory and focal attention.

Authors:  B McElree
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  46 in total

1.  Monkeys have a limited form of short-term memory in audition.

Authors:  Brian H Scott; Mortimer Mishkin; Pingbo Yin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A visual short-term memory advantage for faces.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

3.  Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

4.  Changing change detection: improving the reliability of measures of visual short-term memory capacity.

Authors:  Søren Kyllingsbaek; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

5.  Perceptual Learning of Intonation Contour Categories in Adults and 9- to 11-Year-Old Children: Adults Are More Narrow-Minded.

Authors:  Vsevolod Kapatsinski; Paul Olejarczuk; Melissa A Redford
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

6.  Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Timo Stein; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

7.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Kuba Glazek; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Visual object complexity limits pigeon short-term memory.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Adam M Goodman; Thomas A Daniel; L Caitlin Elmore; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Trial-to-trial carryover in auditory short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Attentional demand influences strategies for encoding into visual working memory.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Robert A Bittner; David E J Linden; Danko Nikolić
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.