Literature DB >> 23098992

Visual object complexity limits pigeon short-term memory.

John F Magnotti1, Adam M Goodman, Thomas A Daniel, L Caitlin Elmore, Anthony A Wright, Jeffrey S Katz.   

Abstract

The study of visual memory has repeatedly shown qualitatively similar visual short-term memory (VSTM) systems between human and many nonhuman species. In studies of human VSTM using change detection, increasing visual object complexity has an inverse effect on accuracy. In the current study, we assessed the functional relationship between visual object complexity and memory performance in visual change detection in pigeons and humans. Visual object complexity was quantified for each object type within each species using visual target search. Change detection performance was inversely related to object complexity in both species, suggesting that pigeon VSTM, like human VSTM, is limited by visual object complexity. Human participants were able to use a verbal-labeling strategy to mitigate some of the effect of visual object complexity, suggesting a qualitative difference in how the two species may solve certain visual discriminations. Considering the visual complexity of novel objects may also help explain previous failures to transfer relational rules to novel visual objects.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23098992      PMCID: PMC3582799          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  16 in total

1.  The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects.

Authors:  G A Alvarez; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-02

2.  Testing pigeon memory in a change detection task.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz; John Magnotti; L Caitlin Elmore; Stephanie Babb; Sarah Alwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

3.  Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  Hing Yee Eng; Diyu Chen; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

4.  Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Kent D Bodily; Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-01

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Visual memory needs categories.

Authors:  Henrik Olsson; Leo Poom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A change detection approach to study visual working memory of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Evelien Heyselaar; Kevin Johnston; Martin Paré
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Change detection for the study of object and location memory.

Authors:  L Caitlin Elmore; Antony D Passaro; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Brian Barton; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Delayed match-to-sample in working memory: A BrainMap meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A Daniel; Jeffrey S Katz; Jennifer L Robinson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.251

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.