Literature DB >> 15933002

Survival of probiotic lactobacilli in acidic environments is enhanced in the presence of metabolizable sugars.

B M Corcoran1, C Stanton, G F Fitzgerald, R P Ross.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG is an industrially significant probiotic strain with proven health benefits. In this study, the effect of glucose on L. rhamnosus GG survival was analyzed in simulated gastric juice at pH 2.0. It was found that the presence of 19.4 mM glucose resulted in up to 6-log10-enhanced survival following 90 min of exposure. Further work with dilute HCl confirmed that glucose was the sole component responsible. Comparative analysis with other Lactobacillus strains revealed that enhanced survival was apparent in all strains, but at different pH values. The presence of glucose at concentrations from 1 to 19.4 mM enhanced L. rhamnosus GG survival from 6.4 to 8 log10 CFU ml(-1) in simulated gastric juice. The mechanisms behind the protective effect of glucose were investigated. Addition of N',N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide to simulated gastric juice caused survival to collapse, which was indicative of a prominent role in inhibition of F0F1-ATPase. Further work with neomycin-resistant mutants that exhibited 38% to 48% of the F0F1-ATPase activity of the parent confirmed this, as the survival in the presence of glucose of these mutants decreased 3 x 10(6)-fold compared with the survival of the wild type (which had a viability of 8.02 log10 CFU ml(-1)). L. rhamnosus GG survival in acidic conditions occurred only in the presence of sugars that it could metabolize efficiently. To confirm the involvement of glycolysis in the glucose effect, iodoacetic acid was used to inhibit glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) activity. The reduction in GAPDH activity caused survival to decrease by 8.30 log10 CFU ml(-1) in the presence of glucose. The data indicate that glucose provides ATP to F0F1-ATPase via glycolysis, enabling proton exclusion and thereby enhancing survival during gastric transit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933002      PMCID: PMC1151822          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3060-3067.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  51 in total

1.  Factors controlling acid tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes: effects of nisin and other ionophores.

Authors:  A R Datta; M M Benjamin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Fecal recovery following oral administration of Lactobacillus strain GG (ATCC 53103) in gelatine capsules to healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Saxelin; T Pessi; S Salminen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Acid and bile tolerance of Lactobacillus isolated from chicken intestine.

Authors:  L Z Jin; Y W Ho; N Abdullah; S Jalaludin
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.858

4.  D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Properties of the enzyme modified at arginine residues.

Authors:  N K Nagradova; E V Schmalhausen; P A Levashov; R A Asryants; V I Muronetz
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  1996 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.926

5.  Energy-spilling reactions of Streptococcus bovis and resistance of its membrane to proton conductance.

Authors:  G M Cook; J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Acid sensitivity of neomycin-resistant mutants of Oenococcus oeni: a relationship between reduction of ATPase activity and lack of malolactic activity.

Authors:  R Tourdot-Maréchal; L C Fortier; J Guzzo; B Lee; C Diviès
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Campylobacter jejuni non-culturable coccoid cells.

Authors:  R R Beumer; J de Vries; F M Rombouts
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  New functional foods in the treatment of food allergy.

Authors:  E Isolauri; S Salminen; T Mattila-Sandholm
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.709

9.  pH regulation by Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  S G Dashper; E C Reynolds
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  W P Charteris; P M Kelly; L Morelli; J K Collins
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  73 in total

Review 1.  Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action.

Authors:  Sarah Lebeer; Jos Vanderleyden; Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Aciduric Strains of Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Isolated from Human Feces, Have Strong Adhesion and Aggregation Properties.

Authors:  Kyle B Klopper; Shelly M Deane; Leon M T Dicks
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Probiotic and Safety Properties of Bacteriocinogenic and Non-Bacteriocinogenic Lactic Acid Bacteria from the Intestines of Nile Tilapia and Common Carp for Their Use as Probiotics in Aquaculture.

Authors:  Pierre Marie Kaktcham; Jules-Bocamdé Temgoua; François Ngoufack Zambou; Gloria Diaz-Ruiz; Carmen Wacher; María de Lourdes Pérez-Chabela
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Probiotic characteristics of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from human milk and colostrum.

Authors:  Ufuk Bagci; Sine Ozmen Togay; Ayhan Temiz; Mustafa Ay
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Probiotic Properties and Cellular Antioxidant Activity of Lactobacillus plantarum MA2 Isolated from Tibetan Kefir Grains.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Chao Li; Zengguo He; Fen Pan; Shuo Pan; Yanping Wang
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Probiotic Validation of a Non-native, Thermostable, Phytase-Producing Bacterium: Streptococcus thermophilus.

Authors:  Paul Priyodip; Seetharaman Balaji
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Cell viability of microencapsulated Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis under freeze-drying, storage and gastrointestinal tract simulation conditions.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shamekhi; Mustafa Shuhaimi; Arbakariya Ariff; Yazid A Manap
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 8.  Stress Physiology of Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Ángel Alegría; Peter A Bron; Maria de Angelis; Marco Gobbetti; Michiel Kleerebezem; José A Lemos; Daniel M Linares; Paul Ross; Catherine Stanton; Francesca Turroni; Douwe van Sinderen; Pekka Varmanen; Marco Ventura; Manuel Zúñiga; Effie Tsakalidou; Jan Kok
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Adaptation of Lactobacillus acidophilus to Thermal Stress Yields a Thermotolerant Variant Which Also Exhibits Improved Survival at pH 2.

Authors:  Sonia Kulkarni; Saiful F Haq; Shalaka Samant; Sunilkumar Sukumaran
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Preserving viability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in vitro and in vivo by a new encapsulation system.

Authors:  Ran Li; Yufeng Zhang; D Brent Polk; Peggy M Tomasula; Fang Yan; LinShu Liu
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.