Literature DB >> 9674129

Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract.

W P Charteris1, P M Kelly, L Morelli, J K Collins.   

Abstract

An in vitro methodology which mimics in vivo human upper gastrointestinal transit was developed. The transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species was determined by exposing washed cell suspensions at 37 degrees C to a simulated gastric juice (pH 2.0), containing pepsin (0.3% w/v) and sodium chloride (0.5% w/v), and a simulated small intestinal juice (pH 8.0), containing pancreatin USP (1 g l-1) and sodium chloride (5 g l-1), and monitoring changes in total viable count periodically. The methodology was also employed to determine the effect of adding milk proteins (1 g l-1), hog gastric mucin (1 g l-1) and soyabean trypsinchymotrypsin inhibitor [SBTCI] (1 g l-1) on transit tolerance. The majority (14 of 15) of isolates lost > 90% viability during simulated gastric transit. Only one isolate, Lactobacillus fermentum KLD, was considered intrinsically resistant. The addition of milk proteins, singly and in combination, generally improved gastric transit tolerance. In this regard, two isolates, Lact. casei 212.3 and Bifidobacterium infantis 25962, exhibited 100% gastric transit tolerance in the presence of milk proteins. In general, the addition of hog gastric mucin did not influence simulated gastric transit tolerance of lactobacilli but tended to increase that of bifidobacteria. However, it increased that of Lact. casei 242 and Lact. salivarius 43338 but diminished that of B. bifidum 2715 and B. animalis Bo. Selected bile salts-resistant isolates were intrinsically tolerant to simulated small intestinal transit. Only Lact. casei F19 and B. adolescentis 15703T showed significant reduction in viability after 240 min. In general, the addition of milk proteins and SBTCI did not affect simulated small intestinal transit tolerance. However, they significantly improved the intrinsic resistance of Lact. casei F19 but diminished that of B. breve 15700T. It is concluded that, whereas the majority of bile salts-resistant lactobacilli and bifidobacteria may be intrinsically sensitive to gastric transit, they are intrinsically resistant to small intestinal transit. In addition, it is postulated that milk proteins and mucin may function as both buffering agents and inhibitors of digestive protease activity in vivo, thereby protecting ingested bacterial strains during upper gastrointestinal transit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9674129     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  101 in total

Review 1.  Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH.

Authors:  Paul D Cotter; Colin Hill
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Engineered lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis capable of binding antibodies and tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Authors:  Matjaz Ravnikar; Borut Strukelj; Natasa Obermajer; Mojca Lunder; Ales Berlec
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Use of artificial digestive systems to investigate the biopharmaceutical factors influencing the survival of probiotic yeast during gastrointestinal transit in humans.

Authors:  Stéphanie Blanquet-Diot; Sylvain Denis; Sandrine Chalancon; Fehd Chaira; Jean-Michel Cardot; Monique Alric
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Gut probiotic bacteria of Barbonymus gonionotus improve growth, hematological parameters and reproductive performances of the host.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdus Salam; Md Ariful Islam; Sulav Indra Paul; Md Mahbubur Rahman; Mohammad Lutfar Rahman; Fatama Islam; Ashikur Rahman; Dinesh Chandra Shaha; Md Shah Alam; Tofazzal Islam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  In vitro assessment of gastrointestinal viability of two photosynthetic bacteria, Rhodopseudomonas palustris and Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  Xu-xia Zhou; Yuan-jiang Pan; Yan-bo Wang; Wei-fen Li
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  How do bifidobacteria counteract environmental challenges? Mechanisms involved and physiological consequences.

Authors:  Lorena Ruiz; Patricia Ruas-Madiedo; Miguel Gueimonde; Clara G de Los Reyes-Gavilán; Abelardo Margolles; Borja Sánchez
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.523

7.  Generation of food-grade recombinant Lactobacillus casei delivering Myxococcus xanthus prolyl endopeptidase.

Authors:  Patricia Alvarez-Sieiro; Maria Cruz Martin; Begoña Redruello; Beatriz Del Rio; Victor Ladero; Brad A Palanski; Chaitan Khosla; Maria Fernandez; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Cell viability of microencapsulated Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis under freeze-drying, storage and gastrointestinal tract simulation conditions.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shamekhi; Mustafa Shuhaimi; Arbakariya Ariff; Yazid A Manap
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Functional Properties of Lactobacillus mucosae Strains Isolated from Brazilian Goat Milk.

Authors:  Georgia Maciel Dias de Moraes; Louricélia Rodrigues de Abreu; Antônio Silvio do Egito; Hévila Oliveira Salles; Liana Maria Ferreira da Silva; Luís Augusto Nero; Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov; Karina Maria Olbrich Dos Santos
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Preliminary evaluation of probiotic potential of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Italian food products.

Authors:  Barbara Turchi; Simone Mancini; Filippo Fratini; Francesca Pedonese; Roberta Nuvoloni; Fabrizio Bertelloni; Valentina Virginia Ebani; Domenico Cerri
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.