Literature DB >> 27466284

Stress Physiology of Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Konstantinos Papadimitriou1, Ángel Alegría2, Peter A Bron3, Maria de Angelis4, Marco Gobbetti4, Michiel Kleerebezem5, José A Lemos6, Daniel M Linares7, Paul Ross8, Catherine Stanton7, Francesca Turroni9, Douwe van Sinderen10, Pekka Varmanen11, Marco Ventura9, Manuel Zúñiga12, Effie Tsakalidou1, Jan Kok13.   

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are important starter, commensal, or pathogenic microorganisms. The stress physiology of LAB has been studied in depth for over 2 decades, fueled mostly by the technological implications of LAB robustness in the food industry. Survival of probiotic LAB in the host and the potential relatedness of LAB virulence to their stress resilience have intensified interest in the field. Thus, a wealth of information concerning stress responses exists today for strains as diverse as starter (e.g., Lactococcus lactis), probiotic (e.g., several Lactobacillus spp.), and pathogenic (e.g., Enterococcus and Streptococcus spp.) LAB. Here we present the state of the art for LAB stress behavior. We describe the multitude of stresses that LAB are confronted with, and we present the experimental context used to study the stress responses of LAB, focusing on adaptation, habituation, and cross-protection as well as on self-induced multistress resistance in stationary phase, biofilms, and dormancy. We also consider stress responses at the population and single-cell levels. Subsequently, we concentrate on the stress defense mechanisms that have been reported to date, grouping them according to their direct participation in preserving cell energy, defending macromolecules, and protecting the cell envelope. Stress-induced responses of probiotic LAB and commensal/pathogenic LAB are highlighted separately due to the complexity of the peculiar multistress conditions to which these bacteria are subjected in their hosts. Induction of prophages under environmental stresses is then discussed. Finally, we present systems-based strategies to characterize the "stressome" of LAB and to engineer new food-related and probiotic LAB with improved stress tolerance.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27466284      PMCID: PMC4981675          DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00076-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev        ISSN: 1092-2172            Impact factor:   11.056


  607 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the structure and function of catalases: clues from molecular evolution and in vitro mutagenesis.

Authors:  M Zámocký; F Koller
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Respiration capacity of the fermenting bacterium Lactococcus lactis and its positive effects on growth and survival.

Authors:  P Duwat; S Sourice; B Cesselin; G Lamberet; K Vido; P Gaudu; Y Le Loir; F Violet; P Loubière; A Gruss
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  CsrRS regulates group B Streptococcus virulence gene expression in response to environmental pH: a new perspective on vaccine development.

Authors:  Isabella Santi; Renata Grifantini; Sheng-Mei Jiang; Cecilia Brettoni; Guido Grandi; Michael R Wessels; Marco Soriani
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Chance phenotypic variation.

Authors:  J W Little
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  The pH-dependent expression of the urease operon in Streptococcus salivarius is mediated by CodY.

Authors:  Szu-Chuan Huang; Robert A Burne; Yi-Ywan M Chen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Identification of a Streptococcus pyogenes SF370 gene involved in production of c-di-AMP.

Authors:  Taichi Kamegaya; Kenji Kuroda; Yoshihiro Hayakawa
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.131

7.  CtsR is the master regulator of stress response gene expression in Oenococcus oeni.

Authors:  Cosette Grandvalet; Françoise Coucheney; Charlotte Beltramo; Jean Guzzo
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Phosphorylation of the RitR DNA-binding domain by a Ser-Thr phosphokinase: implications for global gene regulation in the streptococci.

Authors:  Andrew T Ulijasz; Shaun P Falk; Bernard Weisblum
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Role of osmolytes in adaptation of osmotically stressed and chill-stressed Listeria monocytogenes grown in liquid media and on processed meat surfaces.

Authors:  L T Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The RelA/SpoT homolog (RSH) superfamily: distribution and functional evolution of ppGpp synthetases and hydrolases across the tree of life.

Authors:  Gemma C Atkinson; Tanel Tenson; Vasili Hauryliuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  107 in total

1.  Contribution of YthA, a PspC Family Transcriptional Regulator of Lactococcus lactis F44 Acid Tolerance and Nisin Yield: a Transcriptomic Approach.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Jingui Liu; Sen Miao; Yue Zhao; Hongji Zhu; Mingqiang Qiao; Per Erik Joakim Saris; Jianjun Qiao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Investigating Lactococcus lactis MG1363 Response to Phage p2 Infection at the Proteome Level.

Authors:  Marie-Laurence Lemay; Andreas Otto; Sandra Maaß; Kristina Plate; Dörte Becher; Sylvain Moineau
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Dietary Fibers and Protective Lactobacilli Drive Burrata Cheese Microbiome.

Authors:  Fabio Minervini; Amalia Conte; Matteo Alessandro Del Nobile; Marco Gobbetti; Maria De Angelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Redox cofactor engineering in industrial microorganisms: strategies, recent applications and future directions.

Authors:  Jiaheng Liu; Huiling Li; Guangrong Zhao; Qinggele Caiyin; Jianjun Qiao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Metabolomic and proteomic analysis of D-lactate-producing Lactobacillus delbrueckii under various fermentation conditions.

Authors:  Shaoxiong Liang; Dacheng Gao; Huanhuan Liu; Cheng Wang; Jianping Wen
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  The increase of O-acetylation and N-deacetylation in cell wall promotes acid resistance and nisin production through improving cell wall integrity in Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Lijie Cao; Dongmei Liang; Panlong Hao; Qianqian Song; Ershu Xue; Qinggele Caiyin; Zihao Cheng; Jianjun Qiao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Draft genome sequencing of Sporolactobacillus terrae SBT-1, an efficient bacterium to ferment concentrated sugar to D-lactic acid.

Authors:  Sitanan Thitiprasert; Jirabhorn Piluk; Vasana Tolieng; Naoto Tanaka; Yuh Shiwa; Nobuyuki Fujita; Somboon Tanasupawat; Nuttha Thongchul
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Response characteristics of the membrane integrity and physiological activities of the mutant strain Y217 under exogenous butanol stress.

Authors:  Yue Gao; Xiang Zhou; Miao-Miao Zhang; Ya-Jun Liu; Xiao-Peng Guo; Cai-Rong Lei; Wen-Jian Li; Dong Lu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Task Distribution between Acetate and Acetoin Pathways To Prolong Growth in Lactococcus lactis under Respiration Conditions.

Authors:  Bénédicte Cesselin; Christel Garrigues; Martin B Pedersen; Célia Roussel; Alexandra Gruss; Philippe Gaudu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Characterization of a stress tolerance-defective mutant of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LRB.

Authors:  Saswati Biswas; Andrew Keightley; Indranil Biswas
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.