Literature DB >> 23793843

[Glenoid replacement for omarthritis : indications, technique, results and new developments].

M Pfahler1.   

Abstract

In anatomical shoulder arthroplasty glenoid replacement is a critical point. Although total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) provides better functional and pain results than hemi shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) there is great reluctance to implant a glenoid. For successful glenoid replacement it is necessary to preoperatively evaluate clear indications for glenoid replacement. Planning is a crucial point and has to be done thoroughly. The gold standard is an all polyethylene cemented glenoid. The implantation technique is most important to obtain an excellent and long-term result without complications. Significant key factors are preservation of the subchondral bone and an anatomical reconstruction of the glenoid. It seems that after a period of 10 years the loosening rate of glenoids increases and revisions rates rise. Therefore there is a high demand to develop new implants and a need for improved and convertible glenoids with better modularity and alternative options for fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793843     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-2027-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  22 in total

1.  The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gilles Walch; T Bradley Edwards; Aziz Boulahia; Pascal Boileau; Daniel Mole; Patrice Adeleine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A ten-year radiologic comparison of two-all polyethylene glenoid component designs: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Philippe Collin; Aaron K L Tay; Barbara Melis; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  A Castagna; M Randelli; R Garofalo; L Maradei; A Giardella; M Borroni
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-10

4.  Three-dimensional glenoid deformity in patients with osteoarthritis: a radiographic analysis.

Authors:  P Habermeyer; P Magosch; V Luz; S Lichtenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Results of anatomic nonconstrained prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis with biconcave glenoid.

Authors:  Gilles Walch; Claudio Moraga; Allan Young; Juan Castellanos-Rosas
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Results of cemented total shoulder replacement with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; Markus Schmitt; Thomas Bruckner; Philip Kasten; Guido Pape; Markus Loew; Felix Zeifang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Hemiarthroplasty vs total shoulder replacement for rotator cuff intact osteoarthritis: how do they fare after a decade?

Authors:  Michael J Sandow; Huw David; Steven J Bentall
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 8.  Humeral head replacement versus total shoulder arthroplasty: clinical outcomes--a review.

Authors:  Julie Y Bishop; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis: a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John Sperling; Rachelle Buchbinder; Kelly McMaken
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Midterm results of a total shoulder prosthesis fixed with a cementless glenoid component.

Authors:  Fredy Montoya; Petra Magosch; Bastian Scheiderer; Sven Lichtenberg; Patricio Melean; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.