Literature DB >> 29516108

[Shoulder prosthesis replacement options : New implants, treatment algorithms and clinical results].

D Seybold1, T A Schildhauer2, J Geßmann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bony defect situations are a common problem in revision arthroplasty of the shoulder and are the cause of the complexity of the procedure. Aseptic and septic loosening as well as difficult implant removal can result in humeral and/or glenoid bone loss. PLANNING: A careful preoperative imaging is needed to estimate the extent of the bony defect and to enable precise planning of the bone reconstruction and the required implants. However, the size of the defect needs to be re-evaluated intraoperatively after removal of the implant components and any larger defects have to be addressed appropriately. PROSTHESIS
DESIGN: While in the glenoid autologous bone grafts and, to a lesser extent, allogenic bone grafts are preferred, metallic augmented implants have recently become available to fill the glenoid bone defect. However, humeral defects are normally addressed with longer revision stems, possibly with allograft augmentation. The soft tissue loss in proximal humeral defects can be addressed with fixation techniques to improve function and reduce the risk of dislocation. Modern modular prosthesis designs allow prosthesis conversion while leaving bony, tightly integrated component parts on the glenoid or shaft. This review describes the preoperative diagnostic steps as well as techniques for revision surgery of the shoulder in the case of bone loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Glenoid fossa; Humeral head prosthesis; Prosthesis design; Revision surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29516108     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-018-3549-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  30 in total

Review 1.  Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Miguel Pinedo; Jason Old; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Influence of different peg length in glenoid bone loss: A biomechanical analysis regarding primary stability of the glenoid baseplate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Königshausen; B Jettkant; N Sverdlova; C Ehlert; J Gessmann; T A Schildhauer; D Seybold
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 3.  Options for glenoid bone loss: composites of prosthetics and biologics.

Authors:  Gerald R Williams; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed conventional shoulder replacement due to cuff failure--midterm results.

Authors:  Matthias P Flury; Philipp Frey; Joerg Goldhahn; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Beat R Simmen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Nicolas Morin-Salvo; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Brian L Seeto; Peter N Chalmers; Nicolas Holzer; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael D Hendel; Jason A Bryan; Wael K Barsoum; Eric J Rodriguez; John J Brems; Peter J Evans; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning.

Authors:  Joseph Iannotti; Justin Baker; Eric Rodriguez; John Brems; Eric Ricchetti; Mena Mesiha; Jason Bryan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Revision surgery of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Barbara Melis; David Duperron; Grégory Moineau; Adam P Rumian; Yung Han
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Revision arthroplasty with use of a reverse shoulder prosthesis-allograft composite.

Authors:  Ariel Chacon; Nazeem Virani; Robert Shannon; Jonathan C Levy; Derek Pupello; Mark Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty with retention of the humeral component.

Authors:  Birgit S Werner; Dorota Boehm; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  Dennis Wassenaar; André Busch; Alexander Wegner; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.