Literature DB >> 23793841

[Differential indications for current endoprosthesis systems of the shoulder].

E Wiedemann1.   

Abstract

Modern shoulder prostheses adapt to the size, inclination, posterior offset and retrotorsion of the shoulder anatomy. Typical implants are cup prostheses for surface replacement, stemless prostheses that anchor in metaphyseal bone, anatomical prostheses using stems of different lengths, and last but not least reverse prostheses. The main reasons for implantation of shoulder prostheses are primary osteoarthritis, posttraumatic and rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis, arthritis of instability and cuff defect arthropathy.Anatomical hemiprostheses should be used only if the glenoid is intact as total prostheses are functionally better as soon as the arthritis involves the glenoid. Conventional stems are cemented most of the time and cemented glenoids that are convex on the back are standard. Stemless prostheses were developed for posttraumatic indications and can often replace stemmed designs if the bone quality is good. Reverse prostheses were developed for the treatment of cuff tear arthropathies but if used as a revision implant complication rates rise and survival time is shorter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793841     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-2018-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  11 in total

1.  Loosening performance of cemented glenoid prosthesis design pairs.

Authors:  C Anglin; U P Wyss; R W Nyffeler; C Gerber
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Measurement of glenoid version: conventional radiographs versus computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Bernhard Jost; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott David Martin; David Zurakowski; Thomas S Thornhill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Results of anatomic nonconstrained prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis with biconcave glenoid.

Authors:  Gilles Walch; Claudio Moraga; Allan Young; Juan Castellanos-Rosas
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Modular hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.

Authors:  B H Moeckel; D M Dines; R F Warren; D W Altchek
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time?

Authors:  Luc Favard; Christophe Levigne; Cécile Nerot; Christian Gerber; Lieven De Wilde; Daniel Mole
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Osteonecrosis of bone. Current concepts as to etiology and pathogenesis.

Authors:  R L Cruess
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder.

Authors:  Ofer Levy; Stephen A Copeland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder.

Authors:  R L Samilson; V Prieto
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture.

Authors:  P M Grammont; E Baulot
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stemless humeral component in reverse shoulder prosthesis in patient with Parkinson's disease: a case report.

Authors:  Stefano Giannotti; Vanna Bottai; Giacomo Dell'Osso; Giulia Bugelli; Giulio Guido
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.