Literature DB >> 15929644

Spatial memory and saccadic targeting in a natural task.

María Pilar Aivar1, Mary M Hayhoe, Christopher L Chizk, Ryan E B Mruczek.   

Abstract

Previous work on transsaccadic memory and change blindness suggests that only a small part of the information in the visual scene is retained following a change in eye position. However, some visual representation across different fixation positions seems necessary to guide body movements. To understand what information is retained across gaze positions, it seems necessary to consider the functional demands of vision in ordinary behavior. We therefore examined eye and hand movements in a naturalistic task, where subjects copied a toy model in a virtual environment. Saccadic targeting performance was examined to see if subjects took advantage of regularities in the environment. During the first trials the spatial arrangement of the pieces used to copy the model was kept stable. In subsequent trials this arrangement was changed randomly every time the subject looked away. Results showed that about 20% of saccades went either directly to the location of the next component to be copied or to its old location before the change. There was also a significant increase in the total number of fixations required to locate a piece after a change, which could be accounted for by the corrective movements required after fixating the (incorrect) old location. These results support the idea that a detailed representation of the spatial structure of the environment is typically retained across fixations and used to guide eye movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15929644     DOI: 10.1167/5.3.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  22 in total

1.  Where do we look when we walk on stairs? Gaze behaviour on stairs, transitions, and handrails.

Authors:  Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; Fran Allard; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye-hand coordination while pointing rapidly under risk.

Authors:  Anna Ma-Wyatt; Martin Stritzke; Julia Trommershäuser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visually-guided behavior of homonymous hemianopes in a naturalistic task.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Meghan E Riley; Kristin N Kelly; Mary Hayhoe; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation.

Authors:  David Caduff; Sabine Timpf
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-11-13

5.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Do we have an internal model of the outside world?

Authors:  Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Predictive activity in macaque frontal eye field neurons during natural scene searching.

Authors:  Adam N Phillips; Mark A Segraves
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.