Literature DB >> 17999102

On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation.

David Caduff1, Sabine Timpf.   

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework for assessing the salience of landmarks for navigation. Landmark salience is derived as a result of the observer's point of view, both physical and cognitive, the surrounding environment, and the objects contained therein. This is in contrast to the currently held view that salience is an inherent property of some spatial feature. Salience, in our approach, is expressed as a three-valued Saliency Vector. The components that determine this vector are Perceptual Salience, which defines the exogenous (or passive) potential of an object or region for acquisition of visual attention, Cognitive Salience, which is an endogenous (or active) mode of orienting attention, triggered by informative cues providing advance information about the target location, and Contextual Salience, which is tightly coupled to modality and task to be performed. This separation between voluntary and involuntary direction of visual attention in dependence of the context allows defining a framework that accounts for the interaction between observer, environment, and landmark. We identify the low-level factors that contribute to each type of salience and suggest a probabilistic approach for their integration. Finally, we discuss the implications, consider restrictions, and explore the scope of the framework.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17999102     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  37 in total

1.  Feature integration that routinely occurs without focal attention.

Authors:  M Kubovy; D J Cohen; J Hollier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Spatial attention and object-based attention: a comparison within a single task.

Authors:  David Soto; Manuel J Blanco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Scene content selected by active vision.

Authors:  Derrick J Parkhurst; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

5.  Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: the roles of feature proximity and connectedness.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-07

6.  Modeling recognition memory using the similarity structure of natural input.

Authors:  Joyca P W Lacroix; Jaap M J Murre; Eric O Postma; H Jaap Herik
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-01-02

7.  Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important.

Authors:  L J Williams
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1988

8.  Perceiving real-world scenes.

Authors:  I Biederman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

10.  Control of object-based attention in human cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences; Jens Schwarzbach; Susan M Courtney; Xavier Golay; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  39 in total

1.  Wayfinding in ageing and Alzheimer's disease within a virtual senior residence: study protocol.

Authors:  Rebecca Davis; Jennifer Ohman
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  The Giessen virtual environment laboratory: human wayfinding and landmark salience.

Authors:  Florian Röser; Kai Hamburger; Markus Knauff
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-01-30

3.  Selecting landmarks in novel environments.

Authors:  Jared Miller; Laura Carlson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

4.  How does environmental knowledge allow us to come back home?

Authors:  Laura Piccardi; Massimiliano Palmiero; Alessia Bocchi; Maddalena Boccia; Cecilia Guariglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Turn left where you felt unhappy: how affect influences landmark-based wayfinding.

Authors:  Ceylan Z Balaban; Harun Karimpur; Florian Röser; Kai Hamburger
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-01-09

Review 6.  Topographical disorientation in aging. Familiarity with the environment does matter.

Authors:  Antonella Lopez; Alessandro O Caffò; Andrea Bosco
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  How would you describe a familiar route or put in order the landmarks along it? It depends on your cognitive style!

Authors:  Alessia Bocchi; Marco Giancola; Laura Piccardi; Massimiliano Palmiero; Raffaella Nori; Simonetta D'Amico
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Unified framework for recognition, localization and mapping using wearable cameras.

Authors:  Ricardo Vázquez-Martín; Antonio Bandera
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

9.  Salient Cues and Wayfinding in Alzheimer's Disease within a Virtual Senior Residence.

Authors:  Rebecca Davis; Jennifer M Ohman; Catherine Weisbeck
Journal:  Environ Behav       Date:  2016-11-22

10.  Route memory in an unfamiliar homogeneous environment: a comparison of two strategies.

Authors:  Ahmed Sameer; Braj Bhushan
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.