Literature DB >> 3160275

Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients.

S Hall, J D Bartleson, B M Onofrio, H L Baker, H Okazaki, J D O'Duffy.   

Abstract

Our experience with 68 patients with strictly defined, myelographically proven, surgically confirmed lumbar spinal stenosis seen over a 30-month period was reviewed. Pseudoclaudication was the commonest symptom (94%) and was described by patients as pain (93%), numbness (63%), or weakness (43%). Symptoms were frequently bilateral (68%) and generally relieved by flexing the lumbosacral spine. Neurologic abnormalities were found in a minority of patients and were usually mild. Electromyography showed one or more lumbosacral radiculopathies in 34 of 37 patients examined. Radiographic evidence of degenerative disk or joint disease was found in 63 patients. All patients had stenosis on myelography, with narrowing at L2, L3, and L4 being the commonest; 30% had multi-level stenosis. Two of ten computed tomograms were normal. Surgery was extensive; 72% of patients had three or more laminae removed. At a mean of 4 years after surgery, 84% of patients reported that surgery had yielded good to excellent results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3160275     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-2-271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  32 in total

1.  S-Nitrosoglutathione administration ameliorates cauda equina compression injury in rats.

Authors:  Anandakumar Shunmugavel; Mushfiquddin Khan; Marcus M Martin; Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Thomas C Schuler; Inderjit Singh
Journal:  Neurosci Med       Date:  2012-09-25

2.  Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Vikram Talwar; Derek P Lindsey; Amy Fredrick; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The analysis of the factors affecting lumbar spinal stenosis in adult patients.

Authors:  H Kaptan; M Ilhan; K Cakiroglu; O Kasimcan; C Kilic
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  The prescription of assistive devices for the elderly: practical considerations.

Authors:  J H Wasson; V Gall; R McDonald; M H Liang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Density of lumbar muscles 4 years after decompressive spinal surgery.

Authors:  O Airaksinen; A Herno; E Kaukanen; T Saari; T Sihvonen; O Suomalainen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Economic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Christoph P Hofstetter; Anna S Hofer; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

7.  Metastatic cancer mimicking mechanical low back pain: a case report.

Authors:  Lance M Mabry; Michael D Ross; John M Tonarelli
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

8.  Calcitonin for pseudoclaudication in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J Streifler; R Hering; N Gadoth
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Lumbar canal stenosis: results in 40 patients surgically treated.

Authors:  G Spanu; A L Messina; R Assietti; G Sangiovanni; R Rodriguez y Baena
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Ultrasound lumbar canal measurement in hospital employees with back pain.

Authors:  D J Anderson; D F Adcock; A C Chovil; J J Farrell
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.