Literature DB >> 15926058

Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy.

Ryuichi Sasaoka1, Hiroaki Nakamura, Sadahiko Konishi, Ryuichi Nagayama, Eisuke Suzuki, Hidetomi Terai, Kunio Takaoka.   

Abstract

Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) has been accepted as a minimally invasive procedure for lumbar discectomy because of the small skin incision and short hospital stay required for this surgery. However, there are few objective laboratory data to confirm the reduced systemic responses in the early phase after this procedure. In order to substantiate the reduced invasiveness of MED compared to microdiscectomy (MD) or procedures involved in one-level unilateral laminotomy, the invasiveness of each surgical procedure was evaluated by measuring serum levels of biochemical parameters reflective of a post-operative inflammatory reaction and damage to the paravertebral muscles. Thirty-three patients who underwent lumbar discectomy or one-level unilateral laminotomy (MED in 15 cases, MD in 11 cases and one-level unilateral laminotomy in 7 cases with lumbar spinal canal stenosis) were included in this study. The serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) were measured at 24 h after operation. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured at 2, 4, 8 and -24 h following the surgery to monitor the inflammatory response to the respective surgery. The post-operative serum CRP levels from both the MD and MED groups were significantly lower than those from the open laminotomy group. However, there was no significant difference in these serum levels between the MED and MD groups. The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in the MED group during the first post-operative day were also significantly lower than those in the laminotomy group. When the MED and MD groups were compared, the IL-6 levels in the MED group were lower than in MD group at 2, 4 and 8 h after surgery, but the differences were not statistically significant. However, the level was significantly lower in the MED group at 24 h after surgery. In terms of IL-10, no significant difference was noted between the MED and MD groups over the study period. The changes in serum levels of post-operative inflammatory: markers (CRP, IL-6 and IL-10) in the early phase indicated reduced inflammatory reactions in MED as well as in MD when compared with classical open unilateral laminotomy. These data draw a direct link between the lower level of the inflammatory response and reduced invasiveness of MED. However, an indicator for muscle damage (CPK) appeared not to be affected by the type of surgical procedure used to correct disc herniation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15926058      PMCID: PMC3489336          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0912-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  K L Leung; P B Lai; R L Ho; W C Meng; R Y Yiu; J F Lee; W Y Lau
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Larry T Khoo; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  A special device for endoscopic surgery of lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  J Destandau
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Bernard H Guiot; Larry T Khoo; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Video-assisted endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  T J Huang; R W Hsu; Y Y Lee; S H Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Acute-phase response of human hepatocytes: regulation of acute-phase protein synthesis by interleukin-6.

Authors:  J V Castell; M J Gómez-Lechón; M David; R Fabra; R Trullenque; P C Heinrich
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note.

Authors:  Mick J Perez-Cruet; Kevin T Foley; Robert E Isaacs; Lauri Rice-Wyllie; Robin Wellington; Maurice M Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Differential modulation of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 by diclofenac in patients undergoing major surgery.

Authors:  A M Mahdy; H F Galley; M A Abdel-Wahed; K F el-Korny; S A Sheta; N R Webster
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Retrospective analysis of microsurgical and standard lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  D W Andrews; M H Lavyne
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Acute phase protein response to tissue injury.

Authors:  W M Stahl
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  18 in total

1.  Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability.

Authors:  Samuel R Ward; Choll W Kim; Carolyn M Eng; Lionel J Gottschalk; Akihito Tomiya; Steven R Garfin; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Sidney M Rubinstein; Jorm M Nellensteijn; Wilco C Peul; Mark P Arts; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Transmuscular Microdiscectomy : Technique and Comparison with Conventional Subperiosteal Microdiscectomy during the Early Postoperative Period.

Authors:  Beom-Seok Park; Young-Joon Kwon; Yu-Sam Won; Hyun-Chul Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

4.  Endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Experience of first 100 cases.

Authors:  Amit Jhala; Manish Mistry
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Passive mechanical properties of the lumbar multifidus muscle support its role as a stabilizer.

Authors:  Samuel R Ward; Akihito Tomiya; Gilad J Regev; Bryan E Thacker; Robert C Benzl; Choll W Kim; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  What were the advantages of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation comparing with open discectomy: a meta-analysis?

Authors:  Xiaoping Mu; Jianxun Wei; Peifeng Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

7.  Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  J Rodríguez-Vela; A Lobo-Escolar; E Joven-Aliaga; A Herrera; J Vicente; E Suñén; A Loste; A Tabuenca
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc herniation: comparison of learning curve of the surgery and outcome with other established case studies.

Authors:  Kodeeswaran Marappan; Ranganathan Jothi; Sherina Paul Raj
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

9.  Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark Arts; Ronald Brand; Bas van der Kallen; Geert Lycklama à Nijeholt; Wilco Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of postoperative values for C-reactive protein in minimally invasive and open lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Authors:  John K Houten; Adesh Tandon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.