Literature DB >> 11727096

Video-assisted endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

T J Huang1, R W Hsu, Y Y Lee, S H Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of symptomatic lumbar disc herniations (LDH) remains controversial. This study examines the feasibility and safety of a video-assisted endoscopic intracanalicular technique for managing symptomatic LDH.
METHODS: From September 1999 to June 2000, we used the current technique, the Vertebroscope System, on 11 patients (six men, five women), aged from 18 to 61 years (mean, 45), who had suffered symptomatic LDH. The disc levels involved were at L4-L5 (n = 8), and L5-S1 (n = 3). The Vertebroscope, which has a 30 degrees viewing angle and a working channel 1.7 cm in diameter, was used for the minimally invasive endoscopic procedures. The mean follow-up period was 12 months (range, 6-15).
RESULTS: The operating time ranged from 60 to 335 min (mean, 136.5), and the estimated blood loss during operation was minimal to 200 ml. The mean length of the paramedian skin incisions was 2 cm. No drainage tube was used postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 3 days (range, 2-5), with five patients discharged on the 1st postoperative day. Complications included one superficial wound infection, one conversion to an open procedure when muscle herniation into the working channel created a technical difficulty in approaching the ligamatum flavum, and one minor tear of the nerve root sleeve that did not require further surgery. In the first five patients studied herein, the mean operating time was significantly longer than that for the later five patients (201 vs 72 min, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of the current endoscopic disectomy technique include its minimally invasive character, with less paraspinal muscle trauma, direct address to the lesion site that resembles the open technique, and enhanced operative field visualization with a paramedian skin incision of just 2 cm. Practice is needed to perfect such an endoscopic approach for lumbar disc excision, so the operating time decreased significantly as the surgeons became more familiar with this endoscopic technique. It has proved to be safe and effective for treating patients with symptomatic LDH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11727096     DOI: 10.1007/s004640090125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Jörg Franke; R Greiner-Perth; H Boehm; K Mahlfeld; H Grasshoff; Y Allam; F Awiszus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy.

Authors:  Ryuichi Sasaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura; Sadahiko Konishi; Ryuichi Nagayama; Eisuke Suzuki; Hidetomi Terai; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The State of the Art in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Tsung-Jen Huang; Ki-Tack Kim; Hiroaki Nakamura; Anthony T Yeung; Jiancheng Zeng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.