Literature DB >> 19122093

Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability.

Samuel R Ward1, Choll W Kim, Carolyn M Eng, Lionel J Gottschalk, Akihito Tomiya, Steven R Garfin, Richard L Lieber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Muscular instability is an important risk factor for lumbar spine injury and chronic low-back pain. Although the lumbar multifidus muscle is considered an important paraspinal muscle, its design features are not completely understood. The purpose of the present study was to determine the architectural properties, in vivo sarcomere length operating range, and passive mechanical properties of the human multifidus muscle. We hypothesized that its architecture would be characterized by short fibers and a large physiological cross-sectional area and that it would operate over a relatively wide range of sarcomere lengths but would have very stiff passive material properties.
METHODS: The lumbar spines of eight cadaver specimens were excised en bloc from T12 to the sacrum. Multifidus muscles were isolated from each vertebral level, permitting the architectural measurements of mass, sarcomere length, normalized fiber length, physiological cross-sectional area, and fiber length-to-muscle length ratio. To determine the sarcomere length operating range of the muscle, sarcomere lengths were measured from intraoperative biopsy specimens that were obtained with the spine in the flexed and extended positions. The material properties of single muscle fibers were obtained from passive stress-strain tests of excised biopsy specimens.
RESULTS: The average muscle mass (and standard error) was 146 +/- 8.7 g, and the average sarcomere length was 2.27 +/- 0.06 microm, yielding an average normalized fiber length of 5.66 +/- 0.65 cm, an average physiological cross-sectional area of 23.9 +/- 3.0 cm(2), and an average fiber length-to-muscle length ratio of 0.21 +/- 0.03. Intraoperative sarcomere length measurements revealed that the muscle operates from 1.98 +/- 0.15 microm in extension to 2.70 +/- 0.11 microm in flexion. Passive mechanical data suggested that the material properties of the muscle are comparable with those of muscles of the arm or leg.
CONCLUSIONS: The architectural design (a high cross-sectional area and a low fiber length-to-muscle length ratio) demonstrates that the multifidus muscle is uniquely designed as a stabilizer to produce large forces. Furthermore, multifidus sarcomeres are positioned on the ascending portion of the length-tension curve, allowing the muscle to become stronger as the spine assumes a forward-leaning posture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19122093      PMCID: PMC2663324          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  48 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical analysis of the brachioradialis as a donor in tendon transfer.

Authors:  J Fridén; D Albrecht; R L Lieber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  MRI evaluation of lumbar spine flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  S J Edmondston; S Song; R V Bricknell; P A Davies; K Fersum; P Humphries; D Wickenden; K P Singer
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2000-08

3.  Spastic muscle cells are shorter and stiffer than normal cells.

Authors:  Jan Fridén; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position.

Authors:  N Bogduk; J E Macintosh; M J Pearcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach.

Authors:  Olivier Gille; Erwan Jolivet; Vincent Dousset; Cécile Degrise; Ibrahim Obeid; Jean-Marc Vital; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Light diffraction study of single skeletal muscle fibres.

Authors:  R J Baskin; K P Roos; Y Yeh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture.

Authors:  R L Lieber; J Fridén
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  MRI evaluation of multifidus muscles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Y L Chan; J C Cheng; X Guo; A D King; J F Griffith; C Metreweli
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1999-05

9.  Histochemistry and morphology of the multifidus muscle in lumbar disc herniation: comparative study between diseased and normal sides.

Authors:  W P Zhao; Y Kawaguchi; H Matsui; M Kanamori; T Kimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Lumbar muscle usage in chronic low back pain. Magnetic resonance image evaluation.

Authors:  P L Flicker; J L Fleckenstein; K Ferry; J Payne; C Ward; T Mayer; R W Parkey; R M Peshock
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  59 in total

1.  A comparison of feasibility and safety of percutaneous fluoroscopic guided thoracic pedicle screws between Europeans and Asians: is there any difference?

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Reza Zamani; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Architectural analysis and predicted functional capability of the human latissimus dorsi muscle.

Authors:  Michael E Gerling; Stephen H M Brown
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Skeletal muscle design to meet functional demands.

Authors:  Richard L Lieber; Samuel R Ward
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Characteristics of stabilizer muscles: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sangeeta Sangwan; Rodney A Green; Nicholas F Taylor
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  A randomised controlled trial of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs microdiscectomy.

Authors:  J N Alaistair Gibson; Ashok S Subramanian; Chloe E H Scott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Does pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar multifidus muscle predict clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal decompression for symptomatic spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Mario G T Zotti; F Vilas Boas; T Clifton; M Piche; W W Yoon; B J C Freeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Passive mechanical properties of rat abdominal wall muscles suggest an important role of the extracellular connective tissue matrix.

Authors:  Stephen H M Brown; John Austin Carr; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  The evaluation of lumbar paraspinal muscle quantity and quality using the Goutallier classification and lumbar indentation value.

Authors:  Koji Tamai; Jessica Chen; Michael Stone; Anush Arakelyan; Permsak Paholpak; Hiroaki Nakamura; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Passive mechanical properties of the lumbar multifidus muscle support its role as a stabilizer.

Authors:  Samuel R Ward; Akihito Tomiya; Gilad J Regev; Bryan E Thacker; Robert C Benzl; Choll W Kim; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The relationship between sagittal curvature and extensor muscle volume in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Judith R Meakin; Jonathan Fulford; Richard Seymour; Joanne R Welsman; Karen M Knapp
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.