Literature DB >> 10749610

Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: A prospective randomized trial.

K L Leung1, P B Lai, R L Ho, W C Meng, R Y Yiu, J F Lee, W Y Lau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the systemic cytokine response in patients after laparoscopic-assisted resection with those after open resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic resection of colorectal carcinoma is technically feasible, but objective evidence of its benefit is scarce. Systemic cytokines are accepted as markers of postoperative tissue trauma and mediators of the host immune response.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with rectosigmoid carcinoma, without evidence of metastatic disease and suitable for laparoscopic resection, were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic (n = 17) or conventional open (n = 17) resection of the tumor. Clinical parameters were recorded. Sera were collected before surgery and at appropriate time points afterward and assayed for interleukin-1beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein. The primary end points were the cytokine and C-reactive protein levels. Data were analyzed by intention to treat.
RESULTS: The demographic data of the two groups were comparable. The clinical outcome of both groups was satisfactory, with no surgical deaths and a reasonable complication rate. Both interleukin-1beta and interleukin-6 levels peaked 2 hours after surgery, with the responses in the laparoscopic group significantly less than those in the open group. C-reactive protein levels peaked at 48 hours, and the difference was also statistically significant. Levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha were not elevated after surgery, and there was no difference between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Tissue trauma, as reflected by systemic cytokine response, was less after laparoscopic resection than after open resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. The difference in the systemic cytokine response may have implications on the long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10749610      PMCID: PMC1421025          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200004000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Analysis of serial measurements in medical research.

Authors:  J N Matthews; D G Altman; M J Campbell; P Royston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-01-27

Review 2.  IL-6 and APPs: anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive mediators.

Authors:  H Tilg; C A Dinarello; J W Mier
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1997-09

3.  Laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. Immediate and medium-term results.

Authors:  K L Leung; S P Kwok; W Y Lau; W C Meng; T Y Lam; K H Kwong; C C Chung; A K Li
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-07

4.  Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  J G Stage; S Schulze; P Møller; H Overgaard; M Andersen; V B Rebsdorf-Pedersen; H J Nielsen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection.

Authors:  K A Zucker; D E Pitcher; D T Martin; R S Ford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Interleukin-6 response to laparoscopic and open colectomy.

Authors:  G D Harmon; A J Senagore; M J Kilbride; M J Warzynski
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer.

Authors:  S P Kwok; W Y Lau; P D Carey; S B Kelly; K L Leung; A K Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted segmental colectomy: early Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  P A Dean; R W Beart; H Nelson; T D Elftmann; R T Schlinkert
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: comparative study of immune effects.

Authors:  P M Hewitt; S M Ip; S P Kwok; S S Somers; K Li; K L Leung; W Y Lau; A K Li
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: review of results in 752 patients.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Gastroenterologist       Date:  1995-03
View more
  63 in total

1.  Operative stress response and energy metabolism after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Kai Luo; Jie-Shou Li; Ling-Tang Li; Kei-Hui Wang; Jing-Mei Shun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Postoperative ileus: progress towards effective management.

Authors:  Kathrine Holte; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The effect of erythromycin on gastrointestinal motility in subtotal gastrectomized patients.

Authors:  A-Lan Lee; Choong-Bai Kim
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-02-27

5.  Magnitude of abdominal incision affects the duration of postoperative ileus in rats.

Authors:  K Uemura; M Tatewaki; M B Harris; T Ueno; C R Mantyh; T N Pappas; T Takahashi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responses in exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine.

Authors:  Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of immunologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches in clinical stage III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Ah Han; Woo Yong Lee; Chi-Min Park; Seong Hyeon Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Risk factors for postoperative ileus after urologic laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Myung Joon Kim; Gyeong Eun Min; Koo Han Yoo; Sung-Goo Chang; Seung Hyun Jeon
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-06-09

9.  Reduction of prolonged postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; S Fujita; T Akasu; K Uehara; Y Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Immunologic parameters during NOTES compared with laparoscopy in a randomized blinded porcine trial.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; Naveen K Krishnegowda; Joel E Michalek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.