Literature DB >> 23879672

Facial expression discrimination varies with presentation time but not with fixation on features: a backward masking study using eye-tracking.

Karly N Neath1, Roxane J Itier.   

Abstract

The current study investigated the effects of presentation time and fixation to expression-specific diagnostic features on emotion discrimination performance, in a backward masking task. While no differences were found when stimuli were presented for 16.67 ms, differences between facial emotions emerged beyond the happy-superiority effect at presentation times as early as 50 ms. Happy expressions were best discriminated, followed by neutral and disgusted, then surprised, and finally fearful expressions presented for 50 and 100 ms. While performance was not improved by the use of expression-specific diagnostic facial features, performance increased with presentation time for all emotions. Results support the idea of an integration of facial features (holistic processing) varying as a function of emotion and presentation time.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23879672      PMCID: PMC3926863          DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.812557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  34 in total

1.  Configural information in facial expression perception.

Authors:  A J Calder; A W Young; J Keane; M Dean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks.

Authors:  F Gosselin; P G Schyns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.

Authors:  Gunter Loffler; Gael E Gordon; Frances Wilkinson; Deborah Goren; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Current concerns in visual masking.

Authors:  Stefan Wiens
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-11

5.  Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces.

Authors:  Susan Sullivan; Ted Ruffman; Sam B Hutton
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; James W Tanaka; Andrew C Leon; Thomas McCarry; Marcella Nurse; Todd A Hare; David J Marcus; Alissa Westerlund; B J Casey; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Start position strongly influences fixation patterns during face processing: difficulties with eye movements as a measure of information use.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Dwight J Kravitz; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Transmission of facial expressions of emotion co-evolved with their efficient decoding in the brain: behavioral and brain evidence.

Authors:  Philippe G Schyns; Lucy S Petro; Marie L Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Diagnostic features of emotional expressions are processed preferentially.

Authors:  Elisa Scheller; Christian Büchel; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Holistic gaze strategy to categorize facial expression of varying intensities.

Authors:  Kun Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of task demands on the early neural processing of fearful and happy facial expressions.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Karly N Neath-Tavares
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Younger and Older Users' Recognition of Virtual Agent Facial Expressions.

Authors:  Jenay M Beer; Cory-Ann Smarr; Arthur D Fisk; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.632

3.  The angry versus happy recognition advantage: the role of emotional and physical properties.

Authors:  Filipa Barros; Sandra C Soares; Marta Rocha; Pedro Bem-Haja; Samuel Silva; Daniel Lundqvist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-03

4.  Emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder: effects of emotional information on negative bias.

Authors:  Sabrina Fenske; Stefanie Lis; Lisa Liebke; Inga Niedtfeld; Peter Kirsch; Daniela Mier
Journal:  Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 5.  How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10

6.  Implying social interaction and its influence on gaze behavior to the eyes.

Authors:  Gijs A Holleman; Roy S Hessels; Chantal Kemner; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.