Literature DB >> 25125428

Perceiving crowd attention: ensemble perception of a crowd's gaze.

Timothy D Sweeny1, David Whitney2.   

Abstract

In nearly every interpersonal encounter, people readily gather socio-visual cues to guide their behavior. Intriguingly, social information is most effective in directing behavior when it is perceived in crowds. For example, the shared gaze of a crowd is more likely to direct attention than is a single person's gaze. Are people equipped with mechanisms to perceive a crowd's gaze as an ensemble? Here, we provide the first evidence that the visual system extracts a summary representation of a crowd's attention; observers rapidly pooled information from multiple crowd members to perceive the direction of a group's collective gaze. This pooling occurred in high-level stages of visual processing, with gaze perceived as a global-level combination of information from head and pupil rotation. These findings reveal an important and efficient mechanism for assessing crowd gaze, which could underlie the ability to perceive group intentions, orchestrate joint attention, and guide behavior.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ensemble coding; eye gaze; joint attention; social perception; summary statistical perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25125428      PMCID: PMC4192023          DOI: 10.1177/0956797614544510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  31 in total

1.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

2.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic.

Authors:  D Helbing; I Farkas; T Vicsek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Differential characteristics of face neuron responses within the anterior superior temporal sulcus of macaques.

Authors:  Wania C De Souza; Satoshi Eifuku; Ryoi Tamura; Hisao Nishijo; Taketoshi Ono
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.

Authors:  Gunter Loffler; Gael E Gordon; Frances Wilkinson; Deborah Goren; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Perceiving group behavior: sensitive ensemble coding mechanisms for biological motion of human crowds.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; Steve Haroz; David Whitney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision.

Authors:  Maximilian Riesenhuber; Izzat Jarudi; Sharon Gilad; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The group-member mind trade-off: attributing mind to groups versus group members.

Authors:  Adam Waytz; Liane Young
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-12-08

9.  Reference repulsion in the categorical perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; Steve Haroz; David Whitney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex; John R Cass; Roger J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  Foveal input is not required for perception of crowd facial expression.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; Anna A Kosovicheva; Allison Yamanashi Leib; Katherine Wood; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Differential neurodynamics and connectivity in the dorsal and ventral visual pathways during perception of emotional crowds and individuals: a MEG study.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Cody A Cushing; Noreen Ward; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Set size and ensemble perception of numerical value.

Authors:  Kassandra R Lee; Taylor D Dague; Kenith V Sobel; Nickolas J Paternoster; Amrita M Puri
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Ensemble coding of crowd speed using biological motion.

Authors:  Tram T N Nguyen; Quoc C Vuong; George Mather; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Gaze following in multiagent contexts: Evidence for a quorum-like principle.

Authors:  Francesca Capozzi; Andrew P Bayliss; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

Review 6.  What is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience?

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Daniel C Dennett; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Ensemble size judgments account for size constancy.

Authors:  Jason Haberman; Sneha Suresh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Continuous track paths reveal additive evidence integration in multistep decision making.

Authors:  Cristian Buc Calderon; Myrtille Dewulf; Wim Gevers; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Color variance and achromatic settings.

Authors:  Siddhart S Rajendran; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Cross-cultural and hemispheric laterality effects on the ensemble coding of emotion in facial crowds.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Sang Chul Chong; Jisoo Sun; Troy G Steiner; Daniel N Albohn; Reginald B Adams; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Cult Brain       Date:  2017-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.