Literature DB >> 18953635

Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007.

F Sardanelli1, G M Giuseppetti, G Canavese, L Cataliotti, S Corcione, E Cossu, M Federico, L Marotti, L Martincich, P Panizza, F Podo, M Rosselli Del Turco, C Zuiani, C Alfano, M Bazzocchi, P Belli, S Bianchi, A Cilotti, M Calabrese, L Carbonaro, L Cortesi, C Di Maggio, A Del Maschio, A Esseridou, A Fausto, M Gennaro, R Girometti, R Ienzi, A Luini, S Manoukian, S Morassutt, D Morrone, J Nori, A Orlacchio, F Pane, P Panzarola, R Ponzone, G Simonetti, P Torricelli, G Valeri.   

Abstract

The clinical use of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasing, especially for applications requiring paramagnetic contrast-agent injection. This document presents a synthetic list of acceptable indications with potential advantages for women according to evidence from the literature and the expert opinion of the panel that developed this statement. We generally recommend that breast MR imaging be performed in centres with experience in conventional breast imaging [mammography and ultrasonography (US)] and needle-biopsy procedures (under stereotactic or US guidance) as well as in breast MR imaging and second-look US for findings not revealed by conventional imaging performed before MR imaging. In our opinion, there is no evidence in favour of breast MR imaging as a diagnostic tool to characterise equivocal findings at conventional imaging when needle-biopsy procedures can be performed, nor for the study of asymptomatic, non-high-risk women with negative conventional imaging. After a description of technical and methodological requirements, we define the indications and limitations of breast MR imaging for surveillance of high-risk women, local staging before surgery, evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast previously treated for carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome, nipple discharge and breast implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18953635     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-008-0340-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  39 in total

1.  A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakahara; Kiyoshi Namba; Ryoji Watanabe; Hidemi Furusawa; Takafumi Matsu; Futoshi Akiyama; Goi Sakamoto; Shozo Tamura
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis.

Authors:  Eline E Deurloo; Johannes L Peterse; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Albert P E Besnard; Sara H Muller; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 3.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.

Authors:  Christiane Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Franca Podo; Giuliano D'Agnolo; Arduino Verdecchia; Mariano Santaquilani; Renato Musumeci; Giovanna Trecate; Siranoush Manoukian; Sandro Morassut; Clelia de Giacomi; Massimo Federico; Laura Cortesi; Stefano Corcione; Stefano Cirillo; Vincenzo Marra; Anna Cilotti; Cosimo Di Maggio; Alfonso Fausto; Lorenzo Preda; Chiara Zuiani; Alma Contegiacomo; Antonio Orlacchio; Massimo Calabrese; Lorenzo Bonomo; Ernesto Di Cesare; Maura Tonutti; Pietro Panizza; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging facilitates breast conservation for occult breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Olson; E A Morris; K J Van Zee; D C Linehan; P I Borgen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Preoperative MR imaging in patients with breast cancer: preoperative staging, effects on recurrence rates, and outcome analysis.

Authors:  Uwe Fischer; Friedemann Baum; Susanne Luftner-Nagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  P Belli; M Costantini; M Romani; P Marano; G Pastore
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Monitoring therapeutic efficacy in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Anne A Tardivon; Liliane Ollivier; Carl El Khoury; Fabienne Thibault
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  17 in total

1.  Inflammatory breast carcinoma and locally advanced breast carcinoma: characterisation with MR imaging.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; F Bonetti; E Manfrin; G Pollini; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging.

Authors:  G Carbognin; V Girardi; C Calciolari; A Brandalise; F Bonetti; A Russo; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation.

Authors:  F Fornasa; L Pinali; A Gasparini; E Toniolli; S Montemezzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Size assessment of breast lesions by means of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  G Levrini; R Sghedoni; C Mori; A Botti; R Vacondio; A Nitrosi; M Iori; F Nicoli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Secondary prevention at 360°: the important role of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Guglielmo Manenti; Chiara Pistolese; Sebastiano Fabiano; Roberto Fiori; Andrea Romagnoli; Gianluigi Sergiacomi; Matteo Stefanini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Histopathological image analysis: a review.

Authors:  Metin N Gurcan; Laura E Boucheron; Ali Can; Anant Madabhushi; Nasir M Rajpoot; B Yener
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-30

7.  Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  Andrea Luparia; Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Stefano Ciatto; Davide Bosco; Pier Paolo Campanino; Isabella Castellano; Anna Sapino; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Mammography and MRI for screening women who underwent chest radiation therapy (lymphoma survivors): recommendations for surveillance from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM.

Authors:  Giovanna Mariscotti; Paolo Belli; Daniela Bernardi; Beniamino Brancato; Massimo Calabrese; Luca A Carbonaro; Beatrice Cavallo-Marincola; Francesca Caumo; Paola Clauser; Laura Martinchich; Stefania Montemezzi; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Alberto Tagliafico; Rubina M Trimboli; Chiara Zuiani; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; I Baglio; A Bucci; F Bonetti; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Fischer's score criteria correlating with histopathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; M Tonegutti; F Bonetti; E Manfrin; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.