Literature DB >> 21793075

In vivo 1H MRS in the assessment of the therapeutic response of breast cancer patients.

Uma Sharma1, Hyeon Man Baek, Min Ying Su, Naranamangalam R Jagannathan.   

Abstract

MRI and in vivo MRS have rapidly evolved as sensitive tools for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring in cancer research. In vivo MRS provides information on tumor metabolism, which is clinically valuable in the diagnosis and assessment of tumor response to therapy for the management of women with breast diseases. Several centers complement breast MRI studies with (1)H MRS to improve the specificity of diagnosis. Malignant breast tissues show elevated water-to-fat ratio and choline-containing compounds (total choline, tCho), and any effect of therapy on tissue viability or metabolism will be manifested as changes in these levels. Sequential (1)H MRS studies have shown significantly reduced tCho levels during the course of therapy in patients who were responders. However, there are challenges in using in vivo MRS because of the relatively low sensitivity in detecting the tCho resonance with decreased lesion size or significant reduction in the tumor volume during therapy. MRS is also technically challenging because of the low signal-to-noise ratio and heterogeneous distribution of fat and glandular tissues in the breast. MRS is best utilized for the diagnosis of focal masses, most commonly seen in patients with ductal-type neoplasms; however, it has limitations in detecting nonfocal masses, such as the linear pattern of tumors seen in invasive lobular carcinoma. Further work is required to assess the clinical utility of quantitative MRS, with the goal of automation, which will reduce the subjectivity currently inherent in both qualitative and semi-quantitative MRS.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21793075      PMCID: PMC4226268          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  50 in total

1.  Clinical and radiologic assessments to predict breast cancer pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anne F Schott; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Daniel F Hayes; Celina G Kleer; Lisa A Newman; Lori J Pierce; Kent A Griffith; Susan Murray; Karen A Hunt; Chintana Paramagul; Laurence H Baker
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in patients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Montemurro; Laura Martincich; Giovanni De Rosa; Stefano Cirillo; Vincenzo Marra; Nicoletta Biglia; Marco Gatti; Piero Sismondi; Massimo Aglietta; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Preoperative evaluation of residual tumor extent by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kenji Akazawa; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Tetsuya Taguchi; Yoshio Tanji; Yasuo Miyoshi; Seung Jin Kim; Satsuki Ueda; Tetsu Yanagisawa; Yoshinobu Sato; Shinichi Tamura; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 4.  Primary systemic therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Irina Sachelarie; Michael L Grossbard; Manjeet Chadha; Sheldon Feldman; Munir Ghesani; Ronald H Blum
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-06

Review 5.  MR imaging for assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nola Hylton
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 6.  Primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer: clinical data and biological fall-out.

Authors:  M Maur; V Guarneri; A Frassoldati; P F Conte
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Quantification of choline-containing compounds in malignant breast tumors by 1H MR spectroscopy using water as an internal reference at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Hyun-Man Baik; Min-Ying Su; Hon Yu; Rita Mehta; Orhan Nalcioglu
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Monitoring the therapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer patients: sequential in vivo proton MR spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Mahesh Kumar; N R Jagannathan; V Seenu; S N Dwivedi; P K Julka; G K Rath
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Proton MR spectroscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast cancer diagnosis: preliminary study.

Authors:  Lia Bartella; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw; Laura Liberman; Sunitha B Thakur; Chaya Moskowitz; Jennifer Guido; Wei Huang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Carmel Hayes; Laura Assersohn; Trevor Powles; Andreas Makris; John Suckling; Martin O Leach; Janet E Husband
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  19 in total

1.  In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 conditional knockout mouse model.

Authors:  Min-Hui Cui; Craig A Branch; Sean M Cahill; Thomas J Quinn; Asha Adem; Steven K Libutti; Ziqiang Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Silencing of the glycerophosphocholine phosphodiesterase GDPD5 alters the phospholipid metabolite profile in a breast cancer model in vivo as monitored by (31) P MRS.

Authors:  J P Wijnen; L Jiang; T R Greenwood; M Cheng; M Döpkens; M D Cao; Z M Bhujwalla; B Krishnamachary; D W J Klomp; K Glunde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Multiparametric and Multimodality Functional Radiological Imaging for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Early Treatment Response Assessment.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Antonio C Wolff; Katarzyna J Macura; Vered Stearns; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Riham El Khouli; David A Bluemke; Richard Wahl
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2015-05

Review 4.  New frontiers and developing applications in 19F NMR.

Authors:  Jian-Xin Yu; Rami R Hallac; Srinivas Chiguru; Ralph P Mason
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 9.795

5.  Phospholipase D1 and choline kinase-α are interactive targets in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mayur Gadiya; Noriko Mori; Maria D Cao; Yelena Mironchik; Samata Kakkad; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Kristine Glunde; Balaji Krishnamachary; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  PET/MRI in cancer patients: first experiences and vision from Copenhagen.

Authors:  Andreas Kjær; Annika Loft; Ian Law; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Lise Borgwardt; Johan Löfgren; Camilla Bardram Johnbeck; Adam Espe Hansen; Sune Keller; Søren Holm; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Monitoring response to cytostatic cisplatin in a HER2(+) ovary cancer model by MRI and in vitro and in vivo MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  M E Pisanu; A Ricci; L Paris; E Surrentino; L Liliac; M Bagnoli; S Canevari; D Mezzanzanica; F Podo; E Iorio; R Canese
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  MRS-based Metabolomics in Cancer Research.

Authors:  Tedros Bezabeh; Omkar B Ijare; Alexander E Nikulin; Rajmund L Somorjai; Ian Cp Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2014-02-13

Review 9.  Predicting tumour response.

Authors:  Samuel D Kyle; W Phillip Law; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  High-resolution low-field molecular magnetic resonance imaging of hyperpolarized liquids.

Authors:  Aaron M Coffey; Kirill V Kovtunov; Danila A Barskiy; Igor V Koptyug; Roman V Shchepin; Kevin W Waddell; Ping He; Kirsten A Groome; Quinn A Best; Fan Shi; Boyd M Goodson; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.