Is the "blooming sign" a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography?

The aim of this study was to evaluate potential diagnostic relevance of blooming effect for verification of suspicious breast lesions in MR mammography (MRM). The MRM examinations of 1035 patients, all following the same imaging protocol (from 1994 to 2001) were retrospectively evaluated by two experienced radiologists in consensus. A total of 817 lesions showed a focal enhancement; of these, 793 were histologically verified after surgical intervention so that 514 malignant and 279 benign lesions could be evaluated. Using a 1.5-T Gyroscan ACS II-imager (Philips, Hamburg, Germany) and a double breast coil with the patient lying in a prone position, 0.1 mmol/kgbw Magnevist (Schering, Berlin, Germany) were injected into the cubital vein to obtain dynamic axial and coronal T1-weighted fast-field-echo images every minute up to 7 min after bolus injection. Blooming sign describes a progradient unsharpness of lesion borders initially sharply shaped and fast enhancing 7 min after bolus injection; 324 of 514 (63.0%) malignant lesions and 41 of 279 (14.7%) benign lesions revealed a blooming sign (sensitivity 63.0%, specificity 85.3%, accuracy 70.9%, positive predictive value 88.8%, negative predictive value 56.0%). Forty-one of 279 benign lesions showed a blooming sign; of these, there were 4 of 86 (4.7%) fibroadenomas, 2 of 21 (9.5%) phylloides tumours, 11 of 38 (28.9%) papillomas, 3 of 9 (33.3%) radial scars, 2 of 19 (10.5%) mastitis, 1 of 4 (25%) galactophoritis, 1 of 3 (33.3%) ADH and 19 of 99 (17.2%) mastopathic proliferations, respectively. Blooming sign is a phenomenon which should be taken into account when diagnosing MR mammographies because it might increase the ability to discriminate uncertain breast lesions; however, this effect can only be used as an additional item to other well-known effects such as plateau, washout and cancer corner.