Literature DB >> 15906032

The mesorectum: morphometric assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.

Michael R Torkzad1, Lennart Blomqvist.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the size and configuration of the perirectal fatty tissues using magnetic resonance imaging, including the volume occupied by the rectum itself, and to establish a simple method by which such analysis could be derived. Included in the study were 25 consecutive patients without any large pelvic tumor (diameter of potential pelvic tumor less than 3 cm in any plane) referred for high-resolution pelvic MR imaging. The volume and cross-sectional parameters based on the amount of mesorectum to different sides of the rectum, and the total area occupied, including the rectum, were retrospectively measured using a transaxial three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence. The mesorectum, including the rectum within, occupied an axial area ranging from 320 to 5992 mm(2), and a total volume of 54-323 ml. There was a good correlation between anteroposterior diameter of the perirectal fat at 4 cm below S1-2 and the left-to-right diameter 7 cm below S1-2, and the total volume. Furthermore, the form of mesorectal tissue differed significantly between male and female subjects. In male subjects, measurements in the anteroposterior dimension accurately reflected the volume of mesorectal tissue, while in women, assessment of both the anteroposterior and the size parameters of the mesorectum from the left to right were required for the best evaluation of the volume of mesorectal tissue. The amount of fat posterior to the rectum was significantly more in men than in women, with or without consideration of length of the pelvis. Finally, the contour of the mesorectal fascia was subject to impression by other nearby visceral organs. There is a great individual variation in the amount of mesorectal fat, and in morphometric parameters between the two sexes. The morphological variations of the mesorectum can be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging using a formula based on two simple measurements of the anteroposterior and left-to-right dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15906032     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2657-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  16 in total

1.  The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination.

Authors:  P Quirke; M F Dixon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  R G Beets-Tan; G L Beets; R F Vliegen; A G Kessels; H Van Boven; A De Bruine; M F von Meyenfeldt; C G Baeten; J M van Engelshoven
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-02-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen.

Authors:  L Blomqvist; C Rubio; T Holm; M Machado; T Hindmarsh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project.

Authors:  A L Martling; T Holm; L E Rutqvist; B J Moran; R J Heald; B Cedemark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Brown; A G Radcliffe; R G Newcombe; N S Dallimore; M W Bourne; G T Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  The circumferential margin in rectal cancer. Recommendations based on the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision Study.

Authors:  T Wiggers; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Retrospective measurement of different size parameters of non-radiated rectal cancer on MR images and pathology slides and their comparison.

Authors:  Michael Torkzad; Johan Lindholm; Anna Martling; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma--experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  P Hermanek; H Wiebelt; D Staimmer; S Riedl
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.098

Review 9.  Advances in surgical treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Rullier; C Laurent
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  10 in total

1.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Ho Kyung Chun; Woo-Yong Lee; Seong-Hyeon Yun; Sang-Yong Song; Dongil Choi; Hyo Keun Lim; Min Ju Kim; Jongmee Lee; Soon Jin Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Significance of mesorectal volume in staging of rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and the assessment of involvement of the mesorectal fascia.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Karl A Hansson; Johan Lindholm; Anna Martling; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Correlation of rectal tumor volumes with oncological outcomes for low rectal cancers: does tumor size matter?

Authors:  Muhammad Tayyab; Abdul Razack; Abhiram Sharma; James Gunn; John E Hartley
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  MRI after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer; correlation with histopathology and the role of volumetry.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Johan Lindholm; Anna Martling; Björn Cedermark; Bengt Glimelius; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Factors related to preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin and the extent of mesorectal invasion by magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a prospective comparison study.

Authors:  Young-Wan Kim; Seung-Whan Cha; Juyon Pyo; Nam-Kyu Kim; Byung-Soh Min; Myeong-Jin Kim; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Assessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia status using high-resolution MRI in rectal cancer with rectal distention.

Authors:  Sheng-Xiang Rao; Meng-Su Zeng; Jian-Ming Xu; Xin-Yu Qin; Cai-Zhong Chen; Ren-Chen Li; Ying-Yong Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

Review 8.  Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  O Schaefer; M Langer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 7.034

9.  The importance of rectal cancer MRI protocols on interpretation accuracy.

Authors:  Chikako Suzuki; Michael R Torkzad; Soichi Tanaka; Gabriella Palmer; Johan Lindholm; Torbjörn Holm; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Definition of the rectum and level of the peritoneal reflection - still a matter of debate?

Authors:  Jakub Kenig; Piotr Richter
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.195

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.