Literature DB >> 12594673

Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

G Brown1, A G Radcliffe, R G Newcombe, N S Dallimore, M W Bourne, G T Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine the accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of pathological prognostic factors that influence local recurrence and survival in rectal cancer.
METHODS: Ninety-eight patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for biopsy-proven rectal cancer were assessed prospectively using high-resolution MRI for tumour (T) and nodal (N) staging using the tumour node metastasis classification, depth of extramural tumour spread, the presence or absence of extramural venous invasion, a threatened circumferential resection margin and serosal involvement at or above the peritoneal reflection. Preoperative magnetic resonance assessment of these prognostic factors was compared with histopathological findings in carefully matched whole-mount sections of the resection specimen.
RESULTS: There was 94 per cent weighted agreement (weighted kappa = 0.67) between MRI and pathology assessment of T stage. Agreement between MRI and histological assessment of nodal status was 85 per cent (kappa = 0.68). Although involvement of small veins by tumour was not discernible using MRI, large (calibre greater than 3 mm) extramural venous invasion was identified correctly in 15 of 18 patients (kappa = 0.64). MRI predicted circumferential resection margin involvement with 92 per cent agreement (kappa = 0.81). Seven of nine patients with peritoneal perforation by tumour (stage T4) were identified correctly using MRI.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution MRI of the rectum allows preoperative identification of important surgical and pathological prognostic risk factors. This may allow both better selection and assessment of patients undergoing preoperative therapy. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594673     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  129 in total

1.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Ho Kyung Chun; Woo-Yong Lee; Seong-Hyeon Yun; Sang-Yong Song; Dongil Choi; Hyo Keun Lim; Min Ju Kim; Jongmee Lee; Soon Jin Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Optimised surgery (so-called TME surgery) and high-resolution MRI in the planning of treatment of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J Strassburg; A Lewin; K Ludwig; L Kilian; J Linke; V Loy; P Knuth; O Püttcher; U Ruehl; F Stöckmann; M Hackenthal; W Hopfenmüller; A Huppertz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  How Should Imaging Direct/Orient Management of Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Jemma Bhoday; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Anita Wale; Gina Brown
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

4.  Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging findings in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Charles F Bellows; Bernard Jaffe; Lorenzo Bacigalupo; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Guiseppe Gagliardi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-28

5.  Comparison of treatment results between surgery alone, preoperative short-course radiotherapy, or long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Chung-Hung Yeh; Miao-Fen Chen; Chia-Hsuan Lai; Wen-Shih Huang; Steve P Lee; Wen-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Short-course versus standard chemoradiation in T3 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Theodore S Hong; Harvey Mamon
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011

7.  Regional lymph node metastasis and locoregional recurrence of rectal carcinoma in the era of TME [corrected] surgery. Implications for treatment decisions.

Authors:  Paul Hermanek; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Claus Rödel; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  James S Wu
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

9.  MRI staging of low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Oliver C Shihab; Brendan J Moran; Richard J Heald; Philip Quirke; Gina Brown
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Factors related to preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin and the extent of mesorectal invasion by magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a prospective comparison study.

Authors:  Young-Wan Kim; Seung-Whan Cha; Juyon Pyo; Nam-Kyu Kim; Byung-Soh Min; Myeong-Jin Kim; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.