Literature DB >> 7571056

Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma--experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma.

P Hermanek1, H Wiebelt, D Staimmer, S Riedl.   

Abstract

A reliable evaluation of results of multimodal treatment requires the knowledge of the course of disease in patients treated by surgery alone and of the relevant prognostic factors. The data of a prospective multicentre observation study (Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma, SGCRC) were analyzed by uni- and multivariate methods for the endpoints locoregional recurrence and observed overall survival. 1121 patients with invasive rectum carcinomas are included. In 1056 (94.2%) patients the tumor was resected, 34 patients (3.0%) received postoperative adjuvant therapy, 61 patients (5.4%) preoperative and 25 (2.2%) pre- and postoperative radiation. The observed 5-year survival rate for R0 (no residual tumor) was 55% (95% confidence interval 52-58%), for R1 and R2 only 7% (3-11%). Following R0 resection the 5-year survival rates varied according to pT (74-24%) and pN (68-33%). The 5-year survival was 74% (68-80%) for stage I, 62% (56-68%) for stage II, 40% (35-45%) for stage III and 9% (0-21%) for stage IV. Stage III is prognostically inhomogeneous: pN1: 5-year survival 47% (39-55%), pN2, 3: 34% (27-41%) (p < 0.01). The rate of locoregional recurrence is influenced by tumor related factors (stage and tumor site) and treatment related factors. Local spillage of tumor cells, the treating institution and the individual surgeon are independent factors influencing locoregional recurrence. Between locoregional recurrence and observed 5-year survival exists a highly significant correlation. The most important tumor related prognostic factors following surgical treatment are residual tumor status (R classification) and anatomic extent as described by pTNM and stage grouping UICC). The treating institution as well as the individual surgeon are further independent "prognostic factors" which determine the frequency of locoregional recurrence and thus survival. In analysis of treatment results the institution and the surgeon should be considered, in studies on adjuvant treatment a stratification according to department and surgeon is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7571056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916            Impact factor:   2.098


  44 in total

1.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Renehan; S T O'Dwyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; T A Sheldon; R Gray; A Sowden
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

3.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  The impact of surgical quality on prognosis in patients undergoing rectal carcinoma surgery after preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Marcus Kiehlmann; Klaus Weber; Jonas Göhl; Rainer Fietkau; Abbas Agaimy; Werner Hohenberger; Susanne Merkel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Acceptance of neoadjuvant short-term radiotherapy: a survey under surgeons and radiotherapists.

Authors:  Alexis Ulrich; Jessica Schwerdt; Kaspar Z'graggen; Peter Kienle; Jürgen Weitz; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  [Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer].

Authors:  W Hohenberger; G Lahmer; R Fietkau; R S Croner; S Merkel; J Göhl; R Sauer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is crucial.

Authors:  Hermann Kessler; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Local recurrence after rectal cancer treatment in Manitoba.

Authors:  Steven Latosinsky; Donna Turner
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Minimum Volume Discussion in the Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Current Status and Relevance of Surgeon and Hospital Volume regarding Result Quality and the Impact on Health Economics.

Authors:  Karl-Heinrich Link; Peter Coy; Mark Roitman; Carola Link; Marko Kornmann; Ludger Staib
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-20

10.  Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma: influence of mucin expression (Muc1, 2 and 5) on clinico-pathological features and prognosis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Bárbara Helou Bresciani; Cláudio Bresciani; Igor Proscurshim; Desiderio Kiss; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues; Diego Daniel Pereira; Viviane Rawet; Ivan Cecconnello; Angelita Habr-Gama
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.