Literature DB >> 17265052

MRI after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer; correlation with histopathology and the role of volumetry.

Michael R Torkzad1, Johan Lindholm, Anna Martling, Björn Cedermark, Bengt Glimelius, Lennart Blomqvist.   

Abstract

The objective is to assess if tumor size after radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer can be assessed by a second magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), after radiotherapy prior to surgery and to correlate changes observed on MRI with findings at histopathology at surgery. Twenty-five patients with MRI before and after radiotherapy were included. Variables studied were changes in tumor size, T-staging and distance to the circumferential resection margin (CRM). RVs was measured as tumor volume at surgery (Vs) divided by tumor volume at the initial MRI (Vi) in percent. RVm was defined as the tumor volume at the second MRI (Vm) divided by Vi in percent. The ypT-stage was the same or more favorable than the initial MRI T-stage in 24 of 25 patients. The second MRI was not more accurately predictive than the initial MRI for ypT-staging or distance to CRM (p > 0.05). Vm correlated significantly to Vs, as did RVs to RVm, although the former was always smaller than the latter. Vm and RVm correlated well with ypT-stage (p < 0.001). Volumetry seems to correlate with ypT-stage after preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer. The value of a second MRI after radiotherapy for assessment of distance to CRM and ypT-staging is, however, not apparent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17265052     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0518-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Radiological findings do not support lateral residual tumour as a major cause of local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Syk; M R Torkzad; L Blomqvist; O Ljungqvist; B Glimelius
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Pathological and molecular predictors of the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  F M Smith; J V Reynolds; N Miller; R B Stephens; M J Kennedy
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Longer time interval between completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection does not improve downstaging of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  David E Stein; Najjia N Mahmoud; Pramila Rani Anné; Deborah G Rose; Gerald A Isenberg; Scott D Goldstein; Edith Mitchell; Robert D Fry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  The mesorectum: morphometric assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer--computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L Blomqvist
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.360

6.  Relationship between pathologic T-stage and nodal metastasis after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Salvatore Pucciarelli; Carlo Capirci; Urso Emanuele; Paola Toppan; Maria Luisa Friso; Gian Maria Pennelli; Giovanni Crepaldi; Lara Pasetto; Donato Nitti; Mario Lise
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of radiation therapy-induced microcirculation changes in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Quido G de Lussanet; Walter H Backes; Arjan W Griffioen; Anwar R Padhani; Coen I Baeten; Angela van Baardwijk; Philippe Lambin; Geerard L Beets; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project.

Authors:  A L Martling; T Holm; L E Rutqvist; B J Moran; R J Heald; B Cedemark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Chien-Chih Chen; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Jen-Kou Lin; Ling-Wei Wang; Shung-Haur Yang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  High-resolution MRI of the anatomy important in total mesorectal excision of the rectum.

Authors:  Gina Brown; Alex Kirkham; Geraint T Williams; Michael Bourne; Andrew G Radcliffe; Joanne Sayman; Richard Newell; Chummy Sinnatamby; Richard J Heald
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  9 in total

1.  Is there a benefit in using magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer?

Authors:  Lian-Ming Wu; Jiong Zhu; Jiani Hu; Yan Yin; Hai-Yan Gu; Jia Hua; Jie Chen; Jian-Rong Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jacopo Martellucci; M Scheiterle; B Lorenzi; F Roviello; F Cetta; E Pinto; G Tanzini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Stage and size using magnetic resonance imaging and endosonography in neoadjuvantly-treated rectal cancer.

Authors:  Torbjörn Swartling; Peter Kälebo; Kristoffer Derwinger; Bengt Gustavsson; Göran Kurlberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  How reliable is current imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?

Authors:  Paola De Nardi; Michele Carvello
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  [Preoperative staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  A-O Schäfer; T Baumann; G Pache; T Wiech; M Langer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Assessment of response to chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer using MR volumetry based on diffusion-weighted data sets: a preliminary report.

Authors:  S F Carbone; L Pirtoli; V Ricci; D Venezia; T Carfagno; S Lazzi; V Mourmouras; B Lorenzi; L Volterrani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

8.  MRI for Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using DCE-MR and DW-MR Data Sets: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Mario Petrillo; Roberta Fusco; Orlando Catalano; Mario Sansone; Antonio Avallone; Paolo Delrio; Biagio Pecori; Fabiana Tatangelo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Imaging Advances in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2016-04-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.