Literature DB >> 16416276

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Chan Kyo Kim1, Seung Hoon Kim, Ho Kyung Chun, Woo-Yong Lee, Seong-Hyeon Yun, Sang-Yong Song, Dongil Choi, Hyo Keun Lim, Min Ju Kim, Jongmee Lee, Soon Jin Lee.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Thirty-five patients with a primary rectal cancer who underwent preoperative 3-T MRI using a phased-array coil and had a surgical resection were enrolled in the study group. Preoperatively, three experienced radiologists independently assessed the T and N staging. A confidence level scoring system was used to determine if there was any perirectal invasion, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The interobserver agreement was estimated using kappa statistics. The overall accuracy rate of T staging for rectal cancer was 92%. The diagnostic accuracy was 97% for T1, 89% for T2 and 91% for T3, respectively. The predictive accuracy for perirectal invasion by the three observers was high (Az>0.92). The interobserver agreement for T staging was moderate to substantial. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of mesorectal nodal metastases were 80%, 98%, and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, preoperative 3-T MRI using a phase-array coil accurately indicates the depth of tumor invasion for rectal cancer with a low variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16416276     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0084-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  36 in total

1.  Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  N K Kim; M J Kim; S H Yun; S K Sohn; J S Min
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Ivan Pedrosa; William C Dewolf; Houman Mahallati; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The mesorectum: morphometric assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S J Cawthorn; D V Parums; N M Gibbs; R P A'Hern; S M Caffarey; C I Broughton; C G Marks
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging.

Authors:  H Okizuka; K Sugimura; T Yoshizako; Y Kaji; A Wada
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coils.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gagliardi; Sancar Bayar; Robert Smith; Ronald R Salem
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-04

8.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for minimally invasive resection of rectal adenomas and "Low-risk" carcinomas (uT1, G1 - 2).

Authors:  C Langer; T Liersch; P Markus; M Süss; M Ghadimi; L Füzesi; H Becker
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Routine use of transrectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma: results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  F Marusch; A Koch; U Schmidt; R Zippel; R Kuhn; S Wolff; M Pross; A Wierth; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Depiction and local staging of rectal tumors: comparison of transrectal US before and after water instillation.

Authors:  Sooah Kim; Hyo K Lim; Soon Jin Lee; Dongil Choi; Won Jae Lee; Seong Hyun Kim; Min Ju Kim; Jae Hoon Lim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  21 in total

1.  Current and Future Imaging Paradigms in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Umar Mahmood; Rabi Upadhyay
Journal:  Semin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-06

2.  Improving bladder cancer imaging using 3-T functional dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Huyen T Nguyen; Kamal S Pohar; Guang Jia; Zarine K Shah; Amir Mortazavi; Debra L Zynger; Lai Wei; Daniel Clark; Xiangyu Yang; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Rectal cancer confined to the bowel wall: the role of 3 Tesla phased-array MR imaging in T categorization.

Authors:  Hale Çolakoğlu Er; Elif Peker; Ayşe Erden; İlhan Erden; Ethem Geçim; Berna Savaş
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  3-T MRI with phased-array surface coil in the local staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  F Sani; M Foresti; A Parmiggiani; V D'Andrea; A Manenti; C Amorotti; R Scotti; E Gallo; P Torricelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Quantitative analysis and prediction of regional lymph node status in rectal cancer based on computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Chunyan Cui; Hongmin Cai; Lizhi Liu; Liren Li; Haiying Tian; Li Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Kijima; Takahiro Sasaki; Koichi Nagata; Kenichi Utano; Alan T Lefor; Hideharu Sugimoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Regional lymph node metastasis and locoregional recurrence of rectal carcinoma in the era of TME [corrected] surgery. Implications for treatment decisions.

Authors:  Paul Hermanek; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Claus Rödel; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  MRI in T staging of rectal cancer: How effective is it?

Authors:  Mg Mulla; R Deb; R Singh
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-05

9.  Clinical relevance of morphologic MRI criteria for the assessment of lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fabian Doyon; Ulrike I Attenberger; Dietmar J Dinter; Stefan O Schoenberg; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  [Preoperative staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  A-O Schäfer; T Baumann; G Pache; T Wiech; M Langer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.