Literature DB >> 15891862

Illness severity and parental permission for clinical research in a pediatric ICU population.

Jessie M Hulst1, Jeroen W B Peters, Ada van den Bos, Koen F M Joosten, Johannes B van Goudoever, Luc J I Zimmermann, Dick Tibboel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research in child subjects requires parental permission. We examined whether parental authorization of involvement in a clinical study is influenced by the child's severity of illness at the time of the consent decision. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Observational study in a multidisciplinary tertiary pediatric and neonatal intensive care. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Parents of 421 children (age range from preterm to 18 years) were asked to consent for participation in a study focusing on measuring their child's nutritional status within 24 h after admission to the ICU. Over 20% of the parents (n=88) refused consent, most of them because they expected the study to be too burdensome for their child. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Patient and disease characteristics were comparable in the children for whom consent had or had not been obtained. A higher illness severity score did not decrease the probability of obtaining informed consent, but parents of children with a history of disease were 3.2 times less likely to consent.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents of children with higher illness severity scores are not more likely to decline permission to include their child in clinical observational research on the ICU. History of disease and subjectively perceived burden to the child are important factors that must be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15891862     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2647-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  21 in total

1.  Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study.

Authors:  S A Mason; P J Allmark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Parents' perceptions of research with newborns.

Authors:  Nalini Singhal; Kathleen Oberle; Ellen Burgess; Joelene Huber-Okrainec
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Research in children. A report of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP.

Authors:  Pieter J J Sauer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials--an "elaborate ritual"?

Authors:  S Mason
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Liban       Date:  1994

6.  Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983.

Authors:  A R Keene; D J Cullen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children.

Authors:  S C Harth; Y H Thong
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  M van Stuijvenberg; M H Suur; S de Vos; G C Tjiang; E W Steyerberg; G Derksen-Lubsen; H A Moll
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Routine morphine infusion in preterm newborns who received ventilatory support: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sinno H P Simons; Monique van Dijk; Richard A van Lingen; Daniella Roofthooft; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Niesje Jongeneel; Carin Bunkers; Enna Smink; K J S Anand; John N van den Anker; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Malnutrition in critically ill children: from admission to 6 months after discharge.

Authors:  Jessie Hulst; Koen Joosten; Luc Zimmermann; Wim Hop; Stef van Buuren; Hans Büller; Dick Tibboel; Johannes van Goudoever
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.324

View more
  7 in total

1.  Increasing the participation of children in clinical research.

Authors:  Robert D Truog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2005. III. Nutrition, pediatric and neonatal critical care, and experimental.

Authors:  Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Factors affecting consent in pediatric critical care research.

Authors:  Kusum Menon; Roxanne E Ward; Isabelle Gaboury; Margot Thomas; Ari Joffe; Karen Burns; Deborah Cook
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Ethics of drug research in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Niina Kleiber; Krista Tromp; Miriam G Mooij; Suzanne van de Vathorst; Dick Tibboel; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Crowdsourced analysis of factors and misconceptions associated with parental willingness to donate their child's organs.

Authors:  Amy H Jones; Marni B Jacobs; Tessie W October
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2019-10-28

6.  Strategies to Maximize Enrollment in a Prospective Study of Comatose Children in the PICU.

Authors:  Kristin L McBain; Eric T Payne; Rohit Sharma; Helena Frndova; Nicholas S Abend; Sarah M Sánchez; William B Gallentine; Karen M Cornett; Kendall B Nash; O Carter Snead; Christopher S Parshuram; Jamie S Hutchison; Cecil D Hahn
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 7.  The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research.

Authors:  E Wilman; C Megone; S Oliver; L Duley; G Gyte; J M Wright
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.