Literature DB >> 8746864

Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children.

S C Harth1, Y H Thong.   

Abstract

We interviewed 64 parents by questionnaire after completion of a clinical trial involving their children for their perceptions and attitudes about informed consent. The results show that only a small minority realized that drug trials are designed to assess not only efficacy but safety as well. More worrisome was the majority of parents who felt that drug trials conducted by hospitals are of no or low risks. Moreover, a significant minority offered the view that the strict informed consent procedures we followed were unnecessary because they would do what the doctor advised. Even more worrisome was the small percentage of parents who realized that a signed consent form was primarily meant to protect their rights, and only one-third of the parents knew of their right to withdraw their child unconditionally from the trial at any time. These findings suggest that there may be significant attitudinal barriers to parental understanding of the informed consent process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8746864     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00058-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  15 in total

1.  Informing children and parents about research.

Authors:  A Dawson; S A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Amulya Mandava; Christine Pace; Benjamin Campbell; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Identifying unmet informational needs in the inpatient setting to increase patient and caregiver engagement in the context of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kaziunas; David A Hanauer; Mark S Ackerman; Sung Won Choi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Consent for neonatal research.

Authors:  L McKechnie; A B Gill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Illness severity and parental permission for clinical research in a pediatric ICU population.

Authors:  Jessie M Hulst; Jeroen W B Peters; Ada van den Bos; Koen F M Joosten; Johannes B van Goudoever; Luc J I Zimmermann; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Recruitment strategies and rates of a multi-site behavioral intervention for adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  Verna L Hendricks-Ferguson; Brooke O Cherven; Debra S Burns; Sharron L Docherty; Celeste R Phillips-Salimi; Lona Roll; Kristin A Stegenga; Molly Donovan Stickler; Joan E Haase
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 1.812

7.  Primary caregivers' experience with the informed consent process in the paediatric emergency department: An interview-based qualitative study.

Authors:  Adonis Wazir; Ibrahim Sandokji; Morten Greaves; Rasha D Sawaya
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  "Maybe they have found something new" participants' views on returning cohort psychosocial survey results.

Authors:  Eve Bureau; Isabelle Pellegrini; Catherine Noguès; Christine Lasset; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Pediatric nephrologists' beliefs regarding randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Aaron G Wightman; Assaf P Oron; Jordan M Symons; Joseph T Flynn
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Parental comprehension of the benefits/risks of first-line randomised clinical trials in children with solid tumours: a two-stage cross-sectional interview study.

Authors:  Hélène Chappuy; Naim Bouazza; Veronique Minard-Colin; Catherine Patte; Laurence Brugières; Judith Landman-Parker; Anne Auvrignon; Dominique Davous; Hélène Pacquement; Daniel Orbach; Jean Marc Tréluyer; François Doz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.