Literature DB >> 15876447

Illusory rebound motion and the motion continuity heuristic.

P-J Hsieh1, G P Caplovitz, P U Tse.   

Abstract

A new motion illusion, "illusory rebound motion" (IRM), is described. IRM is qualitatively similar to illusory line motion (ILM). ILM occurs when a bar is presented shortly after an initial stimulus such that the bar appears to move continuously away from the initial stimulus. IRM occurs when a second bar of a different color is presented at the same location as the first bar within a certain delay after ILM, making this second bar appear to move in the opposite direction relative to the preceding direction of ILM. Three plausible accounts of IRM are considered: a shifting attentional gradient model, a motion aftereffect (MAE) model, and a heuristic model. Results imply that IRM arises because of a heuristic about how objects move in the environment: In the absence of countervailing evidence, motion trajectories are assumed to continue away from the location where an object was last seen to move.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15876447     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: a reply to Schneider (2011).

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Transient covert attention does alter appearance: a reply to Schneider (2006).

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-08

Review 3.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Attention enhances contrast appearance via increased input baseline of neural responses.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cutrone; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Primed and unprimed rebounding illusory apparent motion.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko; Nathan H Heller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Cue contrast modulates the effects of exogenous attention on appearance.

Authors:  Stuart Fuller; Yunsoo Park; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.

Authors:  Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Perceptual consequences of visual performance fields: the case of the line motion illusion.

Authors:  Stuart Fuller; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Transient attention does increase perceived contrast of suprathreshold stimuli: a reply to Prinzmetal, Long, and Leonhardt (2008).

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Stuart Fuller; Sam Ling
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.