Literature DB >> 29340915

Primed and unprimed rebounding illusory apparent motion.

Nicolas Davidenko1, Nathan H Heller2.   

Abstract

Although sequences of uncorrelated random dots can yield a wide range of illusorily coherent motion percepts (including translation, rotation, contraction, expansion, shear, and rebounding motion), past priming studies have relied on two-alternative forced choice tasks that only measure unidirectional (positive or negative) priming effects. In Experiment 1 we showed that when participants are primed with unidirectional motion and given an additional option to report bidirectional (rebounding) motion, they do so frequently, suggesting that unidirectional motion can "default" to a rebounding percept. Furthermore, rebounding percepts are more prevalent during trials with long frame durations, suggesting a role for attention in forming and maintaining these illusory percepts. In Experiment 2 we compared rebounding percepts that followed unidirectional, drifting primes with rebounding percepts that followed bidirectional, rebounding primes, and found that these two types of illusory rebounding motion percepts differ systematically in their temporal structures. We argue that rebounding percepts following drifting primes can be understood as a breakdown of positive priming into an underlying oscillatory state, whereas rebounding percepts following rebounding primes may be understood either as (1) the initialization of the same oscillatory process, or (2) the entrainment of a two-step motion pattern by a higher-order mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; Aftereffects; Apparent motion; Priming

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29340915     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1483-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

1.  Independent aftereffects of attention and motion.

Authors:  J C Culham; F A Verstraten; H Ashida; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Self-organized pattern formation: experimental dissection of motion detection and motion integration by variation of attentional spread.

Authors:  Howard S Hock; Cynthia L Park; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Illusory rebound motion and the motion continuity heuristic.

Authors:  P-J Hsieh; G P Caplovitz; P U Tse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Stimulus factors affecting illusory rebound motion.

Authors:  P-J Hsieh; P U Tse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Persistent illusory apparent motion in sequences of uncorrelated random dots.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko; Nathan H Heller; Yeram Cheong; Jacob Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Dissociating Higher and Lower Order Visual Motion Systems by Priming Illusory Apparent Motion.

Authors:  Nathan H Heller; Nicolas Davidenko
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Visual inertia in apparent motion.

Authors:  S Anstis; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities?

Authors:  Allison K Allen; Matthew T Jacobs; Nicolas Davidenko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.004

2.  Visual priming of two-step motion sequences.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko; Nathan H Heller; Maxwell J Schooley; Sean G McDougall
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.