Literature DB >> 19393260

Cue contrast modulates the effects of exogenous attention on appearance.

Stuart Fuller1, Yunsoo Park, Marisa Carrasco.   

Abstract

Exogenous spatial attention can be automatically engaged by a cue presented in the visual periphery. To investigate the effects of exogenous attention, previous studies have generally used highly salient cues that reliably trigger attention. However, the cueing threshold of exogenous attention has been unexamined. We investigated whether the attentional effect varies with cue salience. We examined the magnitude of the attentional effect on apparent contrast [Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 308-313.] elicited by cues with negative Weber contrast between 6% and 100%. Cue contrast modulated the attentional effect, even at cue contrasts above the level at which observers can perfectly localize the cue; hence, the result is not due to an increase in cue visibility. No attentional effect is observed when the 100% contrast cue is presented after the stimuli, ruling out cue bias or sensory interaction between cues and stimuli as alternative explanations. A second experiment, using the same paradigm with high contrast motion stimuli gave similar results, providing further evidence against a sensory interaction explanation, as the stimuli and task were defined on a visual dimension independent from cue contrast. Although exogenous attention is triggered automatically and involuntarily, the attentional effect is gradual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19393260      PMCID: PMC3684626          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  68 in total

1.  Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking?

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search.

Authors:  G Sperling; M J Melchner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Attention trades off spatial acuity.

Authors:  Barbara Montagna; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.

Authors:  Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Transient attention does increase perceived contrast of suprathreshold stimuli: a reply to Prinzmetal, Long, and Leonhardt (2008).

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Stuart Fuller; Sam Ling
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-10
View more
  27 in total

1.  Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: a reply to Schneider (2011).

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attention enhances contrast appearance via increased input baseline of neural responses.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cutrone; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Voluntary attention increases perceived spatial frequency.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  How visual spatial attention alters perception.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-09

6.  Extinguishing Exogenous Attention via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Directional processing within the perceptual span during visual target localization.

Authors:  Harold H Greene; Alexander Pollatsek; Kathleen Masserang; Yen Ju Lee; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Cuing effects of faces are dependent on handedness and visual field.

Authors:  Emma Ferneyhough; Damian A Stanley; Elizabeth A Phelps; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

9.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Independent effects of adaptation and attention on perceived speed.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Katrin Herrmann; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.