Literature DB >> 19757922

Perceptual consequences of visual performance fields: the case of the line motion illusion.

Stuart Fuller1, Marisa Carrasco.   

Abstract

Illusory line motion (ILM) is the illusion that a line, preceded by a small dot (cue) near one end, is perceived to shoot out from the dot even though the line is physically presented at once. Does this illusion result from a low-level motion effect, a gradient of exogenous spatial attention, or both? Given that exogenous attention speeds visual processing unequally at isoeccentric cardinal locations (M. Carrasco, A. M. Giordano, & B. McElree, 2004), we hypothesized that the contribution of attention to ILM would follow the same pattern. We characterized psychometric functions of perceived line motion direction, for 1.5 degrees stimuli with varying amounts of physical line motion (8 levels) at four cardinal locations. We used three cue conditions to separate the effects of attention from low-level motion-a single cue to draw focal attention to the stimulus location, a distributed cue with elements near all four possible stimulus locations, and no visual cue. Distributed and single cues generate identical effects along the horizontal meridian, but the effect of the single cue is progressively greater along the vertical meridian, more so at the top location ("North"). We conclude that the low-level motion explanation accounts for the majority of the canonical example of the ILM (line preceded by a single dot) effect used in our study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757922      PMCID: PMC3703960          DOI: 10.1167/9.4.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  50 in total

1.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

Authors:  M Carrasco; B McElree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Asymmetry of the human visual field in magnetic response to apparent motion.

Authors:  T Naito; Y Kaneoke; N Osaka; R Kakigi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-05-26       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Endogenous attention and illusory line motion reexamined.

Authors:  W C Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Attention-generated apparent motion.

Authors:  Z L Lu; G Sperling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Measuring the attentional speed-up in the motion induction effect.

Authors:  M von Grünau; L Racette; M Kwas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visual attention and metacontrast modify latency to perception in opposite directions.

Authors:  K Kirschfeld; T Kammer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field.

Authors:  J E Raymond
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The influence of two spatially distinct primers and attribute priming on motion induction.

Authors:  J Faubert; M Von Grünau
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual attention mechanisms show a center-surround organization.

Authors:  B A Steinman; S B Steinman; S Lehmkuhle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Visual attention revealed by an illusion of motion.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; S Shimojo
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  16 in total

1.  Remapping of the line motion illusion across eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher; Alessio Fracasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Displacement of location in illusory line motion.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard; Susan E Ruppel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-08

3.  Temporal attention improves perception similarly at foveal and parafoveal locations.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Rachel N Denison; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: the extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Aaron Nizam; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visual performance fields: frames of reference.

Authors:  Jennifer E Corbett; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Voluntary attention improves performance similarly around the visual field.

Authors:  Simran Purokayastha; Mariel Roberts; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Covert spatial attention is functionally intact in amblyopic human adults.

Authors:  Mariel Roberts; Rachel Cymerman; R Theodore Smith; Lynne Kiorpes; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Does Allocation of Attention Influence Relative Velocity and Strength of Illusory Line Motion?

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard; Susan E Ruppel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-22

9.  Modeling visual performance differences 'around' the visual field: A computational observer approach.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The interaction of vision and audition in two-dimensional space.

Authors:  Martine Godfroy-Cooper; Patrick M B Sandor; Joel D Miller; Robert B Welch
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.