Literature DB >> 18979688

Transient attention does increase perceived contrast of suprathreshold stimuli: a reply to Prinzmetal, Long, and Leonhardt (2008).

Marisa Carrasco1, Stuart Fuller, Sam Ling.   

Abstract

Carrasco, Ling, and Read (2004) showed that transient attention increases perceived contrast. However, Prinzmetal, Long, and Leonhardt (2008) suggest that for targets of low visibility, observers may bias their response toward the cued location, and they propose a cue-bias explanation for our previous results. Our response is threefold. First, we outline several key methodological differences between the studies that could account for the different results. We conclude that the cue-bias hypothesis is a plausible explanation for Prinzmetal et al.'s (2008) results, given the characteristics of their stimuli, but not for the studies by Carrasco and colleagues, in which the stimuli were suprathreshold (Carrasco, Ling, & Read, 2004; Fuller, Rodriguez, & Carrasco, 2008; Ling & Carrasco, 2007). Second, we conduct a study to show that the stimuli used in our previous studies are not near-threshold, but suprathreshold (Experiment 1, Phase 1). Furthermore, we found an increase in apparent contrast for a high-contrast stimulus when it was precued, but not when it was postcued, providing more evidence against a cue-bias hypothesis (Experiment 1, Phase 2). We also show that the visibility of the stimuli in Prinzmetal et al. (2008) was much lower than that of Carrasco, Ling, and Read, rendering their stimuli susceptible to their cue-bias explanation (Experiment 2). Third, we present a comprehensive summary of all the control conditions used in different labs that have ruled out a cue bias explanation of the appearance studies. We conclude that a cue-bias explanation may operate with near-threshold and low-visibility stimuli, as was the case in Prinzmetal et al. (2008), but that such an explanation has no bearing on studies with suprathreshold stimuli. Consistent with our previous studies, the present data support the claim that attention does alter the contrast appearance of suprathreshold stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18979688      PMCID: PMC2638121          DOI: 10.3758/pp.70.7.1151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  67 in total

1.  Spatial uncertainty explains exogenous and endogenous attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection.

Authors:  Ian C Gould; Bradley J Wolfgang; Philip L Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Christian Henrich; Stefan Treue
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Apparent contrast differs across the vertical meridian: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Stuart Fuller; Ruby Z Rodriguez; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-01

5.  How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Gerardo Viera; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Barbara Montagna; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Involuntary attention and brightness contrast.

Authors:  William Prinzmetal; Virginia Long; James Leonhardt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-10

8.  Transient covert attention does alter appearance: a reply to Schneider (2006).

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-08

9.  Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load.

Authors:  Bahador Bahrami; David Carmel; Vincent Walsh; Geraint Rees; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Spatial attention and the latency of neuronal responses in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Joonyeol Lee; Tori Williford; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  28 in total

1.  Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: a reply to Schneider (2011).

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Cross-modal cueing of attention alters appearance and early cortical processing of visual stimuli.

Authors:  Viola S Störmer; John J McDonald; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Cross-modal attention enhances perceived contrast.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Attention enhances contrast appearance via increased input baseline of neural responses.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cutrone; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  The offline stream of conscious representations.

Authors:  Claire Sergent
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Voluntary attention increases perceived spatial frequency.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  How visual spatial attention alters perception.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-09

9.  Attention enhances apparent perceptual organization.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Sirui Liu; Ruth Kimchi; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

10.  Attention trades off spatial acuity.

Authors:  Barbara Montagna; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.