Literature DB >> 15868360

The validation of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary multivessel disease: a comparison with SPECT and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography.

I Erhard1, J Rieber, P Jung, M Hacker, T Schiele, H-U Stempfle, A König, M Baylacher, K Theisen, U Siebert, V Klauss.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a new but well established parameter for the hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses. A FFR below 0.75 was validated as functionally significant in coronary one or two vessel disease. This study was designed to prospectively define the best FFR cut off value (BCV) in patients with multivessel disease using two noninvasive tests, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT) and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) as reference methods.
METHODS: 47 symptomatic patients (29 male, mean age 64+/-10 yrs) with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (50-75% diameter stenosis) entered the study. DSE (5-40 microg/min/kg dobutamine) was performed after intravenous injection of a second generation transpulmonary contrast agent. SPECT (Tc-99m-MIBI) was done at peak stress. All tests (DSE, SPECT and FFR) were performed within 4 weeks.
RESULTS: SPECT yielded positive results in 15 and DSE in 16 patients, respectively. Mean FFR measured in the target lesion (RCA n=10; LAD n=22, RCX n=15) was 0.80+/-0.13. FFR was <0.75 in 15 patients. By performing a ROC analysis the BCV (highest sum of sensitivity and specificity) was found at 0.75. At this cut off value using both non-invasive tests as reference method, sensitivity and specificity were 83 and 77%.
CONCLUSION: In patients with multivessel disease, a FFR <0.75 identifies a hemodynamically relevant lesion as compared to DSE and SPECT. This study underlines that FFR criteria are also applicable in patients with complex coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868360     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-005-0213-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kardiol        ISSN: 0300-5860


  19 in total

1.  A randomized comparison of 4 doses of intracoronary adenosine in the assessment of fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  G Casella; J Rieber; T M Schiele; H-U Stempfle; U Siebert; M Leibig; K Theisen; U Buchmeier; V Klauss
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2003-08

2.  Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; J Bartunek; K Kulecki; J W Bech; H De Winter; P Van Crombrugge; G R Heyndrickx; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S A Chamuleau; M Meuwissen; B L van Eck-Smit; K T Koch; A de Jong; R J de Winter; C E Schotborgh; M Bax; H J Verberne; J G Tijssen; J J Piek
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  B de Bruyne; J Bartunek; S U Sys; N H Pijls; G R Heyndrickx; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Accuracy of dipyridamole SPECT imaging in identifying individual coronary stenoses and multivessel disease in women versus men.

Authors:  M I Travin; M S Katz; A W Moulton; N J Miele; B L Sharaf; L L Johnson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Reliability of pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve in assessing coronary artery stenosis in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Usui; Taishiro Chikamori; Hidefumi Yanagisawa; Takayuki Morishima; Satoshi Hida; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kenji Takazawa; Akira Yamashina
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemic events.

Authors:  N H Pijls; G J Bech; M I el Gamal; H J Bonnier; B De Bruyne; B Van Gelder; H R Michels; J J Koolen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Correlation between thallium-201 myocardial perfusion defects and the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis as assessed by pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Hidefumi Yanagisawa; Taishiro Chikamori; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Tsuguhisa Hatano; Takayuki Morishima; Satoshi Hida; Hitoshi Iino; Kazutaka Amaya; Kenji Takazawa; Akira Yamashina
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.993

9.  Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; J Bartunek; S U Sys; G R Heyndrickx
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurement in humans: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new pressure monitoring angioplasty guide wire.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; W J Paulus; P J Vantrimpont; S U Sys; G R Heyndrickx
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  6 in total

1.  Fractional Flow Reserve: Does a Cut-off Value add Value?

Authors:  Shah R Mohdnazri; Thomas R Keeble; Andrew Sp Sharp
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

2.  [Ischemic burden vs. coronary artery morphology : What is crucial for the indication of revascularization?].

Authors:  D Heber; M Hacker
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn Meuwissen; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies; Maria Siebes; Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging by single-photon emission tomography (MPI SPECT) versus Instantaneous wave-free ratio (IFR) for assessment of functional significance of intermediate coronary artery lesions.

Authors:  Osama Ahmed Amin; Yasser Ahmed Abdel Hady; Mohammad Ahmad Nour El-Din Esmail
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2019-12-29

5.  Effect of Elevated Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure on Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Discordance.

Authors:  Hassan Tahir; James Livesay; Benjamin Fogelson; Raj Baljepally
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2021-02-23

6.  Diagnostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion IQ-SPECT without and with computed tomography-based attenuation correction to predict clinically significant and insignificant fractional flow reserve: A single-center prospective study.

Authors:  Haruki Tanaka; Teruyuki Takahashi; Norihiko Ohashi; Koichi Tanaka; Takenori Okada; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.