Literature DB >> 12972110

Reliability of pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve in assessing coronary artery stenosis in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

Yasuhiro Usui1, Taishiro Chikamori, Hidefumi Yanagisawa, Takayuki Morishima, Satoshi Hida, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Kenji Takazawa, Akira Yamashina.   

Abstract

In 167 patients with suspected coronary artery disease, 74 of whom had myocardial infarction (MI), measurement of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) in previous infarction territories, using a cut-off point of 0.75, showed a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 79% for myocardial ischemia as demonstrated by thallium-201 myocardial imaging. This sensitivity and specificity were similar to a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 72% observed in territories not related to MI. In addition, a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the best predictability of FFR for myocardial ischemia was between 0.74 and 0.76, regardless of the presence or absence of MI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12972110     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00829-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  The relationship between myocardial SPECT and fractional flow reserve: is it drifting apart?

Authors:  Michael Rees
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Marcus Hacker; Johannes Rieber; Rupert Schmid; Christian Lafougere; Andreas Tausig; Karl Theisen; Volker Klaus; Reinhold Tiling
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Fractional flow reserve and myocardial viability as assessed by SPECT perfusion scintigraphy in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Branko Beleslin; Milan Dobric; Dragana Sobic-Saranovic; Vojislav Giga; Jelena Stepanovic; Ana Djordjevic-Dikic; Milan Nedeljkovic; Sinisa Stojkovic; Vladan Vukcevic; Goran Stankovic; Dejan Orlic; Zorica Petrasinovic; Smiljana Pavlovic; Vladimir Obradovic; Miodrag Ostojic
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  The validation of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary multivessel disease: a comparison with SPECT and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  I Erhard; J Rieber; P Jung; M Hacker; T Schiele; H-U Stempfle; A König; M Baylacher; K Theisen; U Siebert; V Klauss
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-05

Review 5.  The pressure wire in practice.

Authors:  Lucy J Blows; Simon R Redwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Tc-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Stefan Förster; Johannes Rieber; Christopher Ubleis; Mayo Weiss; Peter Bartenstein; Paul Cumming; Volker Klauss; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Clinical Relevance of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve: Art-of-state.

Authors:  Yohanes Adiputra; Shao-Liang Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Clinical usefulness of instantaneous wave-free ratio for the evaluation of coronary artery lesion with prior myocardial infarction: A multi-center study.

Authors:  Shusuke Fukuoka; Tairo Kurita; Akihiro Takasaki; Tomoyuki Nakata; Naoki Fujimoto; Jun Masuda; Kozo Hoshino; Takashi Tanigawa; Sukenari Koyabu; Masaaki Ito; Kaoru Dohi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-12-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.