Literature DB >> 23752699

Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia.

Tim P van de Hoef1, Martijn Meuwissen, Javier Escaned, Justin E Davies, Maria Siebes, Jos A E Spaan, Jan J Piek.   

Abstract

Documentation of inducible myocardial ischaemia, related to the coronary stenosis of interest, is of increasing importance in lesion selection for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an easily understood, routine diagnostic modality that has become part of daily clinical practice, and is used as a surrogate technique for noninvasive assessment of myocardial ischaemia. However, the application of a single, discrete, cut-off value for FFR-guided lesion selection for PCI, and its adoption in contemporary revascularization guidelines, has limited the requirement for a thorough understanding of the physiological basis of FFR. This limitation constitutes an obstacle for the adequate use and interpretation of this technique, and also for the understanding of new and future modalities of physiological functional intracoronary testing. In this Review, we revisit the fundamental elements of coronary physiology in the absence or presence of coronary artery disease. We provide insight into three essential characteristics of FFR as a diagnostic tool in contemporary clinical practice--the theoretical framework of FFR and its associated limitations; the characteristics and role of FFR as a surrogate for noninvasively assessed myocardial ischaemia; and the requirement and associated caveats of potent vasodilatory drugs to induce maximal vasodilatation of the coronary vascular bed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23752699     DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol        ISSN: 1759-5002            Impact factor:   32.419


  136 in total

Review 1.  Functional measurement of coronary stenosis.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Jan-Willem E M Sels
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.

Authors:  William F Fearon; Bernhard Bornschein; Pim A L Tonino; Raffaella M Gothe; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Seema Pursnani; Frederick Korley; Ravindra Gopaul; Pushkar Kanade; Newry Chandra; Richard E Shaw; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Assessment of coronary artery stenosis during PTCA by measurement of the trans-stenotic pressure gradient. Comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  C Lamm; P Albertsson; M Dohnal; U Tylén; H Emanuelsson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Does coronary vasodilation after adenosine override endothelin-1-induced coronary vasoconstriction?

Authors:  Catalin Loghin; Stefano Sdringola; K Lance Gould
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity.

Authors:  Martijn Meuwissen; Maria Siebes; Steven A J Chamuleau; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Karel T Koch; Robbert J de Winter; Jan G P Tijssen; Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Pressure-diameter relationship in human coronary arteries.

Authors:  Olivier Muller; Stylianos A Pyxaras; Catalina Trana; Fabio Mangiacapra; Emanuele Barbato; William Wijns; Charles A Taylor; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 6.546

9.  Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study).

Authors:  Sayan Sen; Kaleab N Asrress; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Ricardo Petraco; Iqbal S Malik; Rodney A Foale; Ghada W Mikhail; Nicolas Foin; Christopher Broyd; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Amarjit Sethi; Mahmud Al-Bustami; David Hackett; Masood A Khan; Muhammed Z Khawaja; Christopher S Baker; Michael Bellamy; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Carlo Di Mario; Javier Escaned; Simon Redwood; Justin E Davies
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Differences between automatically detected and steady-state fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Tobias Härle; Sven Meyer; Felix Vahldiek; Albrecht Elsässer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Impact of proximal and distal cuff inflation on brachial artery endothelial function in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Dick H J Thijssen; Daniel J Green; Ellen A Dawson; Maxime Boidin; Ruth Thompson; Nigel T Cable
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Miao Chu; Neng Dai; Junqing Yang; Jelmer Westra; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Physiome approach for the analysis of vascular flow reserve in the heart and brain.

Authors:  Kyung Eun Lee; Ah-Jin Ryu; Eun-Seok Shin; Eun Bo Shim
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Comparison between minimum lumen cross-sectional area and intraluminal ultrasonic intensity analysis using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound for prediction of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Hironori Takami; Shinjo Sonoda; Yoshitaka Muraoka; Toshiya Miura; Akiyoshi Shimizu; Reo Anai; Yoshinori Sanuki; Tetsu Miyamoto; Yasushi Oginosawa; Yoshihisa Fujino; Yuki Tsuda; Masaru Araki; Yutaka Otsuji
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis.

Authors:  A M Bucher; C N De Cecco; U J Schoepf; R Wang; F G Meinel; S R Binukrishnan; J V Spearman; T J Vogl; B Ruzsics
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: does coronary pressure never lie?

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn A van Lavieren; José P S Henriques; Jan J Piek; Bimmer E P M Claessen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

9.  Imaging. Can FFRCT replace old indices of coronary stenosis severity?

Authors:  Javier Escaned
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Simultaneous evaluation of plaque stability and ischemic potential of coronary lesions in a fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Authors:  Xinlei Wu; Clemens von Birgelen; Su Zhang; Daixin Ding; Jiayue Huang; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.