Literature DB >> 12955409

A randomized comparison of 4 doses of intracoronary adenosine in the assessment of fractional flow reserve.

G Casella1, J Rieber, T M Schiele, H-U Stempfle, U Siebert, M Leibig, K Theisen, U Buchmeier, V Klauss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a measure of coronary stenosis severity that is based on pressure measurements obtained at maximal hyperemia. Therefore, achievement of maximal vasodilatation of the coronary microcirculation is a prerequisite for the measurement of FFR. The study was designed to address the hypothesis that intracoronary adenosine yields more complete vasodilatation of the coronary microcirculation when high doses are used, resulting in a more accurate FFR measurement.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients with 43 moderate lesions underwent determination of FFR during cardiac catheterization. FFR was calculated in all lesions as the ratio of the distal coronary pressure to the aortic pressure at hyperemia. Different incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine (16, 24, 32 and 40 microg for both coronary arteries) were administered in a randomized fashion.
RESULTS: No adverse events occurred with any intracoronary adenosine bolus. At baseline there were no significant differences for mean aortic and distal coronary pressure, heart rate as well as FFR values between the different doses. FFR was not significantly altered from the different incremental adenosine doses. However, in 27 (63%) out of 43 lesions there was a further reduction of FFR up to 0.23 when a dose >16 microg was injected.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that doses of adenosine up to 40 microg are safe and can be used to achieve a more pronounced vasodilatation in individual patients compared to the standard doses. This may have therapeutic impact with FFR values near cut-off points in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography as well as in patients in whom FFR is used to assess the outcome of interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955409     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-003-0948-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kardiol        ISSN: 0300-5860


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Authors:  Jens Röther; Stephan Achenbach; Monique Tröbs; Florian Blachutzik; Holger Nef; Mohamed Marwan; Christian Schlundt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  The validation of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary multivessel disease: a comparison with SPECT and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  I Erhard; J Rieber; P Jung; M Hacker; T Schiele; H-U Stempfle; A König; M Baylacher; K Theisen; U Siebert; V Klauss
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-05

3.  [Effect of caffeine on myocardial blood flow during pharmacological vasodilation].

Authors:  J P Wielepp; E Fricke; D Horstkotte; W Burchert
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-02

4.  Assessment of increasing intravenous adenosine dose in fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  David Sparv; Matthias Götberg; Jan Harnek; Tobias Persson; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; David Erlinge
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.