Literature DB >> 2480218

Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation.

V E Amassian1, R Q Cracco, P J Maccabee.   

Abstract

Percutaneous stimulation of human motor cortex electrically (focal anode) and with magnetic coils (MCs) of various designs is compared. The theoretical prediction was confirmed that positioning the standard round MC laterally and orientating it more towards the vertical induces an electric field appropriate for directly exciting corticospinal neurons (cf., the conventional tangential orientation at the vertex). Thus, during voluntary contraction, minimal latency compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) in contralateral arm were elicited both by focal anodic and appropriately orientated MC stimulation. Conduction time from motor cortex to motoneuron was estimated by subtracting peripheral conduction time and monosynaptic delay at the motoneuron from the overall CMAP latency, yielding an estimated corticospinal conduction velocity as high as 66 m/sec. Discontinuous latency variations observed in population CMAPs or individual motor units approximated mono- or polysynaptic cortical synaptic delays and, therefore, are attributed to the intervals between direct and early, or late indirect corticospinal discharges. A TV computer system was used to track movements of individual digits and the hand following MC stimulation. An appropriately orientated MC readily elicited movements predominantly of a single digit, implying focal activation of motor cortex. A double square and a small pointed MC proved especially convenient for eliciting reproducibly single digit movements. Stronger stimulation revealed a topographical gradient in the responses of the different digits. Responses to a given MC stimulus a little above threshold were variable in amplitude, which could not be explained by the relationship of stimulus to phase of the cardiac or respiratory cycle. Overall, our findings indicate the importance of appropriately orientating a standard round MC and using a specially designed MC to obtain the various types of motor response to stimulation of cerebral cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2480218     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(89)90029-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  40 in total

1.  Spinal cord-evoked potentials and muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in 10 awake human subjects.

Authors:  D A Houlden; M L Schwartz; C H Tator; P Ashby; W A MacKay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Electric field induced in a spherical volume conductor from arbitrary coils: application to magnetic stimulation and MEG.

Authors:  H Eaton
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Assessing cortical network properties using TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Cortical neuron activation induced by electromagnetic stimulation: a quantitative analysis via modelling and simulation.

Authors:  Tiecheng Wu; Jie Fan; Kim Seng Lee; Xiaoping Li
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Orientation-specific fast rTMS maximizes corticospinal inhibition and facilitation.

Authors:  Tobias Tings; Nicolas Lang; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modulation of cortical oscillatory activity during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Debora Brignani; Paolo Manganotti; Paolo M Rossini; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Time-varying coupling of EEG oscillations predicts excitability fluctuations in the primary motor cortex as reflected by motor evoked potentials amplitude: an EEG-TMS study.

Authors:  Florinda Ferreri; Fabrizio Vecchio; David Ponzo; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.

Authors:  K Sakai; Y Ugawa; Y Terao; R Hanajima; T Furubayashi; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Short-latency subliminal effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on forearm motoneurones.

Authors:  F Baldissera; P Cavallari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: cortical motor maps in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  L J Streletz; J K Belevich; S M Jones; A Bhushan; S H Shah; G J Herbison
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.