Literature DB >> 20805726

Electroconvulsive therapy stimulus parameters: rethinking dosage.

Angel V Peterchev1, Moacyr A Rosa, Zhi-De Deng, Joan Prudic, Sarah H Lisanby.   

Abstract

In this article, we review the parameters that define the electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) electrical stimulus and discuss their biophysical roles. We also present the summary metrics of charge and energy that are conventionally used to describe the dose of ECT and the rules commonly deployed to individualize the dose for each patient. We then highlight the limitations of these summary metrics and dosing rules in that they do not adequately capture the roles of the distinct stimulus parameters. Specifically, there is strong theoretical and empirical evidence that stimulus parameters (pulse amplitude, shape, and width, and train frequency, directionality, polarity, and duration) exert unique neurobiological effects that are important for understanding ECT outcomes. Consideration of the distinct stimulus parameters, in conjunction with electrode placement, is central to further optimization of ECT dosing paradigms to improve the risk-benefit ratio. Indeed, manipulation of specific parameters, such as reduction of pulse width and increase in number of pulses, has already resulted in dramatic reduction of adverse effects, while maintaining efficacy. Furthermore, the manipulation of other parameters, such as current amplitude, which are commonly held at fixed, high values, might be productively examined as additional means of targeting and individualizing the stimulus, potentially reducing adverse effects. We recommend that ECT dose be defined using all stimulus parameters rather than a summary metric. All stimulus parameters should be noted in treatment records and published reports. To enable research on optimization of dosing paradigms, we suggest that ECT devices provide capabilities to adjust and display all stimulus parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20805726      PMCID: PMC2933093          DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181e48165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J ECT        ISSN: 1095-0680            Impact factor:   3.635


  160 in total

1.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.

Authors:  N Lang; M A Nitsche; W Paulus; J C Rothwell; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stimulation with minimum power.

Authors:  F OFFNER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1946-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Modeling the excitation of fibers under surface electrodes.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities.

Authors:  H A Sackeim; J Prudic; D P Devanand; M S Nobler; S H Lisanby; S Peyser; L Fitzsimons; B J Moody; J Clark
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05

5.  Decreased memory loss associated with right unilateral ultra-brief pulse wave ECT.

Authors:  Suck Won Kim; Jon E Grant; Barry R Rittberg; John E Simon; Craig J Vine; S Charles Schulz
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2007-01

6.  Limbic-frontal circuitry in major depression: a path modeling metanalysis.

Authors:  D A Seminowicz; H S Mayberg; A R McIntosh; K Goldapple; S Kennedy; Z Segal; S Rafi-Tari
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Comparison of clinical efficacy and side effects for bitemporal and bifrontal electrode placement in electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Catherine J Bakewell; Joan Russo; Craig Tanner; David H Avery; John F Neumaier
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.635

8.  Human cerebral cortical responses to contralateral transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  V E Amassian; R Q Cracco
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; F Pilato; E Saturno; M Dileone; P Mazzone; A Insola; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Effects of pulse amplitude, pulse frequency, and stimulus duration on seizure threshold: a laboratory investigation.

Authors:  Chittaranjan Andrade; Singaravelu Kurinji; Suresh Sudha; J Suresh Chandra
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.635

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Somatic treatments for mood disorders.

Authors:  Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Exploring how extracellular electric field modulates neuron activity through dynamical analysis of a two-compartment neuron model.

Authors:  Guo-Sheng Yi; Jiang Wang; Xi-Le Wei; Kai-Ming Tsang; Wai-Lok Chan; Bin Deng; Chun-Xiao Han
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 4.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human.

Authors:  Ivan Alekseichuk; Kathleen Mantell; Sina Shirinpour; Alexander Opitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A review of ultrabrief pulse width electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Colleen K Loo; Natalie Katalinic; Donel Martin; Isaac Schweitzer
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  A two-site, open-label, non-randomized trial comparing Focal Electrically-Administered Seizure Therapy (FEAST) and right unilateral ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy (RUL-UBP ECT).

Authors:  Gregory L Sahlem; William V McCall; E Baron Short; Peter B Rosenquist; James B Fox; Nagy A Youssef; Andrew J Manett; Suzanne E Kerns; Morgan M Dancy; Laryssa McCloud; Mark S George; Harold A Sackeim
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Current electroconvulsive therapy practice and research in the geriatric population.

Authors:  Nancy Kerner; Joan Prudic
Journal:  Neuropsychiatry (London)       Date:  2014-02

9.  Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Genetics-based manipulation of adipose tissue sympathetic innervation.

Authors:  Marie François; Emily Qualls-Creekmore; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud; Heike Münzberg; Sangho Yu
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.