Literature DB >> 11990840

Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines.

John S Sarzier1, Avery J Evans, David W Cahill.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors conducted a biomechanical study to evaluate pedicle screw pullout strength in osteoporotic cadaveric spines. Nonaugmented hemivertebrae were compared with pressurized polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented hemivertebrae.
METHODS: Six formalin-fixed cadaveric thoracolumbar spines at least two standard deviations below the mean bone mineral density (BMD) for age were obtained. Radiographic and BMD studies were correlated to grades I, II, and III osteoporosis according to the Jekei scale. Each of the 21 vertebrae underwent fluoroscopic placement of 6-mm transpedicular screws with each hemivertebra serving as the control for the contralateral PMMA-augmented hemivertebra. Pedicle screws were then evaluated for biomechanical axial pullout resistance. Augmented hemivertebrae axial pullout forces were increased (p = 0.0005). The mean increase in pullout force was 181% for Grade I, 206% for Grade II, and 213% for Grade III osteoporotic spines. Augmented Grade I osteoporotic spines demonstrated axial pullout forces near those levels reported in the literature for nonosteoporotic specimens. Augmented Grade II osteoporotic specimens demonstrated increases to levels found in nonaugmented vertebrae with low-normal BMD. Augmented Grade III osteoporotic specimens had increases to levels equal to those found in nonaugmented Grade I vertebrae.
CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae in PMMA-assisted vertebroplasty can significantly increase pedicle screw pullout forces to levels exceeding the strength of cortical bone. The maximum attainable force appears to be twice the pullout force of the nonaugmented pedicle screw for each osteoporotic grade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11990840     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2002.96.3.0309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  39 in total

1.  Factors affecting the interface of cervical spine facet screws placed in the technique by Roy-Camille et al.

Authors:  T R Pitzen; S Zenner; D Barbier; T Georg; W I Steudel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Pedicle screw augmentation from a biomechanical perspective].

Authors:  V Bullmann; U R Liljenqvist; R Rödl; T L Schulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Assessment of the morpho-densitometric parameters of the lumbar pedicles in osteoporotic and control women undergoing routine abdominal MDCT examinations.

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Giorgos Papadokostakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae.

Authors:  Wei Lei; Zixiang Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Stability of anterior vertebral body screws after kyphoplasty augmentation. An experimental study to compare anterior vertebral body screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement.

Authors:  O Linhardt; C Lüring; J Matussek; C Hamberger; T Herold; W Plitz; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques in Osteoporotic and Traumatic Fractures.

Authors:  Valérie Bousson; Bassam Hamze; Guillaume Odri; Thomas Funck-Brentano; Philippe Orcel; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  In-screw cement augmentation for iliosacral screw fixation in posterior ring pathologies with insufficient bone stock.

Authors:  M A König; S Hediger; J W Schmitt; T Jentzsch; K Sprengel; C M L Werner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery].

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich A Spiegl; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.